255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23370681)
1. Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):E533-9. PubMed ID: 23370681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal Study of the Six Degrees of Freedom Cervical Spine Range of Motion During Dynamic Flexion, Extension, and Rotation After Single-level Anterior Arthrodesis.
Anderst WJ; West T; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Nov; 41(22):E1319-E1327. PubMed ID: 27831986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.
Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.
Anderst W; Baillargeon E; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):E594-601. PubMed ID: 23429677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 24210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion.
Ren D; Hu Z; Yuan W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E410-5. PubMed ID: 26583468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):E514-20. PubMed ID: 24480943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Wang B; Ke W; Sun W; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical motion segment contributions to head motion during flexion\extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2538-43. PubMed ID: 26334229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical spine segmental vertebral motion in healthy volunteers feigning restriction of neck flexion and extension.
Puglisi F; Strimpakos N; Papathanasiou M; Kapreli E; Bonelli A; Sgambetterra S; Ferrari R
Int J Legal Med; 2007 Sep; 121(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16847699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level degeneration on cervical spine range of motion using multivariate analyses.
Simpson AK; Biswas D; Emerson JW; Lawrence BD; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 18197104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
