186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23370891)
41. Migration in Confined 3D Environments Is Determined by a Combination of Adhesiveness, Nuclear Volume, Contractility, and Cell Stiffness.
Lautscham LA; Kämmerer C; Lange JR; Kolb T; Mark C; Schilling A; Strissel PL; Strick R; Gluth C; Rowat AC; Metzner C; Fabry B
Biophys J; 2015 Sep; 109(5):900-13. PubMed ID: 26331248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A novel mechanotactic 3D modeling of cell morphology.
Mousavi SJ; Doweidar MH
Phys Biol; 2014 Aug; 11(4):046005. PubMed ID: 25051183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Modeling and predictions of biphasic mechanosensitive cell migration altered by cell-intrinsic properties and matrix confinement.
Pathak A
Phys Biol; 2018 Jun; 15(6):065001. PubMed ID: 29648543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Mechanical trapping of the nucleus on micropillared surfaces inhibits the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells but not cervical cancer HeLa cells.
Nagayama K; Hamaji Y; Sato Y; Matsumoto T
J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26054426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cell migration through three-dimensional confining pores: speed accelerations by deformation and recoil of the nucleus.
Krause M; Yang FW; Te Lindert M; Isermann P; Schepens J; Maas RJA; Venkataraman C; Lammerding J; Madzvamuse A; Hendriks W; Te Riet J; Wolf K
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Aug; 374(1779):20180225. PubMed ID: 31431171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cell migration on microposts with surface coating and confinement.
Hui J; Pang SW
Biosci Rep; 2019 Feb; 39(2):. PubMed ID: 30674640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Engineering interfacial migration by collective tuning of adhesion anisotropy and stiffness.
George E; Barai A; Shirke P; Majumder A; Sen S
Acta Biomater; 2018 May; 72():82-93. PubMed ID: 29574184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Approaches to Determine Nuclear Shape in Cells During Migration Through Collagen Matrices.
Svoren M; Camerini E; van Erp M; Yang FW; Bakker GJ; Wolf K
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2608():97-114. PubMed ID: 36653704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Lamin A/C and Vimentin as a Coordinated Regulator during Amoeboid Migration in Microscale Confined Microenvironments.
Wang YJ; Liang H; Liu Y; Bao Q; Yang S; Xu XX; Chen YC; Liu W; Shi X; Shi Y; Liu X; Liu B; Gao H; Jiu Y; Liu YJ
Nano Lett; 2023 Jul; 23(14):6727-6735. PubMed ID: 37459599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assembly and Use of a Microfluidic Device to Study Cell Migration in Confined Environments.
Keys J; Windsor A; Lammerding J
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1840():101-118. PubMed ID: 30141042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Nuclear softening is essential for protease-independent migration.
Das A; Barai A; Monteiro M; Kumar S; Sen S
Matrix Biol; 2019 Sep; 82():4-19. PubMed ID: 30641137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How Nucleus Mechanics and ECM Microstructure Influence the Invasion of Single Cells and Multicellular Aggregates.
Giverso C; Arduino A; Preziosi L
Bull Math Biol; 2018 May; 80(5):1017-1045. PubMed ID: 28409417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A computational model of amoeboid cell migration.
Lim FY; Koon YL; Chiam KH
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013 Oct; 16(10):1085-95. PubMed ID: 23342988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Generation of fluorescent cell-derived-matrix to study 3D cell migration.
Godeau AL; Delanoë-Ayari H; Riveline D
Methods Cell Biol; 2020; 156():185-203. PubMed ID: 32222219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The consequences of ageing, progeroid syndromes and cellular senescence on mechanotransduction and the nucleus.
Gilbert HTJ; Swift J
Exp Cell Res; 2019 May; 378(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 30836065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Dual role of the nucleus in cell migration on planar substrates.
Moure A; Gomez H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Oct; 19(5):1491-1508. PubMed ID: 31907682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. JID VisualDx quiz: July 2013.
Styperek A; Kirsner RS
J Invest Dermatol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):e6. PubMed ID: 23760053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Calculation of the force field required for nucleus deformation during cell migration through constrictions.
Estabrook ID; Thiam HR; Piel M; Hawkins RJ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 May; 17(5):e1008592. PubMed ID: 34029312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Rear cortex contraction aids in nuclear transit during confined migration by increasing pressure in the cell posterior.
Keys J; Cheung BCH; Elpers MA; Wu M; Lammerding J
J Cell Sci; 2024 Jun; 137(12):. PubMed ID: 38832512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Nuclear position relative to the Golgi body and nuclear orientation are differentially responsive indicators of cell polarized motility.
Brasch ME; Passucci G; Gulvady AC; Turner CE; Manning ML; Henderson JH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211408. PubMed ID: 30759123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
