129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23371315)
1. Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty.
Stjernschantz Forsberg J; Hansson MG; Eriksson S
J Med Ethics; 2014 May; 40(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 23371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris.
Shapshay S; Pimple KD
J Med Ethics; 2007 Jul; 33(7):414-7. PubMed ID: 17601870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defending the duty to research?
Brassington I
Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19594723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. John Harris' argument for a duty to research.
Brassington I
Bioethics; 2007 Mar; 21(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 17845487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Free riders and pious sons--why science research remains obligatory.
Chan S; Harris J
Bioethics; 2009 Mar; 23(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 18445091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The case for a duty to research: not yet proven.
Brassington I
J Med Ethics; 2014 May; 40(5):329-30. PubMed ID: 23454720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):37-8. PubMed ID: 19003705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific research is a moral duty.
Harris J
J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 15800367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):28-36. PubMed ID: 19003704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Standard of care, professional obligations, and distributive justice.
Mackay D
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):352-9. PubMed ID: 22978692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there a duty to provide medical care to HIV-infectious patients? Facts, fallacies, fairness, and the future.
Freedman B
Can Fam Physician; 1990 Mar; 36():479-82. PubMed ID: 11659249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.
Koplin JJ; Savulescu J; Vears DF
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32005225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aping political science.
Lunstroth J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 May; 9(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 19396673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human rights: the normative engine of fairness and research in developing countries.
McMillan J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):47-9. PubMed ID: 20526973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of research in mental illness.
Ghaemi SN; Hundert EM
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. No-fault compensation for human subjects injured in biomedical research: a public policy conflict.
Glass JC
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(3):2-7. PubMed ID: 4034661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Participating in biomedical research.
Folayan MO; Mutengu-Kasirye L; Calazans G
JAMA; 2009 Nov; 302(20):2201-2; author reply 2202. PubMed ID: 19934415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]