These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23371792)

  • 21. The role of episodic memory in controlled evaluative judgments about attitudes: an event-related potential study.
    Johnson R; Simon EJ; Henkell H; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):945-960. PubMed ID: 21262245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are we aware of our ability to forget? Metacognitive predictions of directed forgetting.
    Friedman MC; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1448-56. PubMed ID: 21638106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A negative semantic similarity effect on short-term order memory: evidence from recency judgements.
    Tse CS
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):638-56. PubMed ID: 20687000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differential temporo-parietal cortical networks that support relational and item-based recency judgments.
    Kimura HM; Hirose S; Kunimatsu A; Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Watanabe T; Abe O; Ohtomo K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3474-80. PubMed ID: 19909817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. States of awareness across multiple memory tasks: obtaining a "pure" measure of conscious recollection.
    Hamilton M; Rajaram S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jan; 112(1):43-69. PubMed ID: 12423899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Free and cued selective reminding and selective reminding in the elderly.
    Grober E; Merling A; Heimlich T; Lipton RB
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):643-54. PubMed ID: 9408795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory guides the processing of event changes for older and younger adults.
    Wahlheim CN; Zacks JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):30-50. PubMed ID: 29985021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency.
    Hintzman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 19966243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of varying cue-load on amnesic and normal cued recall.
    Jackson HF
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 3785655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How does error correction occur during lexical learning?
    Iwaki N; Takahashi I; Kaneko S
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1272-1287. PubMed ID: 38488873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Memory for flip-flopping: detection and recollection of political contradictions.
    Putnam AL; Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1198-210. PubMed ID: 24858525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Effects of initial familiarity and source recollection on confidence ratings of recognition memory].
    Yano M; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15747552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall.
    Wilson JH; Kellen D; Criss AH
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 31297701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inhibition and interference in the think/no-think task.
    Racsmány M; Conway MA; Keresztes A; Krajcsi A
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 21987123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.