245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23372115)
1. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.
Emmert M; Sander U; Pisch F
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):e24. PubMed ID: 23372115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
McLennan S
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
Emmert M; Meier F
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.
Kolb B; Emmert M; Sander U; Patzelt C; Schöffski O
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Nov; 137-138():42-53. PubMed ID: 30190204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.
Terlutter R; Bidmon S; Röttl J
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Mar; 16(3):e97. PubMed ID: 24686918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.
McLennan S
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Sep; 21(9):e14336. PubMed ID: 31573918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites.
Emmert M; Sander U; Esslinger AS; Maryschok M; Schöffski O
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 22101427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.
Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review.
Guetz B; Bidmon S
Health Policy; 2023 Jun; 132():104821. PubMed ID: 37084700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients' Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System.
Shah AM; Muhammad W; Lee K; Naqvi RA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
McLennan S
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A Decade of Online Physician-Rating Websites in Germany: an Assessment of the Current Level of Development].
Emmert M; Meszmer N
Gesundheitswesen; 2018 Oct; 80(10):851-858. PubMed ID: 28759920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
