These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23372136)
1. In selected sites, short, rough-surfaced dental implants are as successful as long dental implants: a critical summary of Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(9):856-863. Balevi B J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 23372136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Wallace SS; Froum SJ Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-year prospective multicenter clinical trial of non-submerged dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface in 200 patients. Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Jones AA; Jones JD; Kaiser DA; Taylor TD; Weber HP; Higginbottom FL; Richardson JR; Oates T J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):990-9. PubMed ID: 21235337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers. Carr AB J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading. Nordin T; Nilsson R; Frykholm A; Hallman M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 15623065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single versus splinted short implants at sinus augmented sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Afrashtehfar KI; Katsoulis J; Koka S; Igarashi K J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 122(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 33002610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure rates of short (≤ 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review. Sun HL; Huang C; Wu YR; Shi B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):816-25. PubMed ID: 21841992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study. Fischer K; Bäckström M; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 18384399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. Khang W; Feldman S; Hawley CE; Gunsolley J J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 11699480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical trials of endosseous implants: issues in analysis and interpretation. Listgarten MA Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):299-313. PubMed ID: 9151563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative infections after dental implant placement: Variables associated with increased risk of failure. Camps-Font O; Martín-Fatás P; Clé-Ovejero A; Figueiredo R; Gay-Escoda C; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Periodontol; 2018 Oct; 89(10):1165-1173. PubMed ID: 29797721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study. Rossi F; Ricci E; Marchetti C; Lang NP; Botticelli D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):937-43. PubMed ID: 20701620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Bischof M; Nedir R; Szmukler-Moncler S; Bernard JP; Samson J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 15355394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Implant Length on Survival of Rough-Surface Implants in Nonaugmented Posterior Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Ravidà A; Majzoub J; Alassadi M; Saleh MH; Askar H; Wang HL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1359-1369. PubMed ID: 31711077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Javed F; Romanos GE Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25366871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate loading of 190 endosseous dental implants: a prospective observational study of 40 patient treatments with up to 2-year data. Nikellis I; Levi A; Nicolopoulos C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 14982364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]