These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23372657)

  • 1. Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.
    Bolhuis DP; Lakemond CM; de Wijk RA; Luning PA; de Graaf C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53288. PubMed ID: 23372657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation.
    Weijzen PL; Smeets PA; de Graaf C
    Br J Nutr; 2009 Oct; 102(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 19356272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation.
    Zijlstra N; de Wijk RA; Mars M; Stafleu A; de Graaf C
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2009 Aug; 90(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 19515731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men.
    Bolhuis DP; Lakemond CM; de Wijk RA; Luning PA; Graaf Cd
    J Nutr; 2011 Dec; 141(12):2242-8. PubMed ID: 22049294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake.
    Wansink B; Painter JE; North J
    Obes Res; 2005 Jan; 13(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15761167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of bite size and duration of oral processing on retro-nasal aroma release - features contributing to meal termination.
    Ruijschop RM; Zijlstra N; Boelrijk AE; Dijkstra A; Burgering MJ; Graaf Cd; Westerterp-Plantenga MS
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Jan; 105(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 20836901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive Distraction at Mealtime Decreases Amount Consumed in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Crossover Exploratory Study.
    Liguori CA; Nikolaus CJ; Nickols-Richardson SM
    J Nutr; 2020 May; 150(5):1324-1329. PubMed ID: 32060552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expected satiation after repeated consumption of low- or high-energy-dense soup.
    Hogenkamp PS; Brunstrom JM; Stafleu A; Mars M; de Graaf C
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Jul; 108(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 22017801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of salt intensity on ad libitum intake of tomato soup similar in palatability and on salt preference after consumption.
    Bolhuis DP; Lakemond CM; de Wijk RA; Luning PA; de Graaf C
    Chem Senses; 2010 Nov; 35(9):789-99. PubMed ID: 20705808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caloric intake and eating behavior in infants and toddlers with cystic fibrosis.
    Powers SW; Patton SR; Byars KC; Mitchell MJ; Jelalian E; Mulvihill MM; Hovell MF; Stark LJ
    Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):E75-5. PubMed ID: 11986481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Bite Count Feedback from a Wearable Device and Goal Setting on Consumption in Young Adults.
    Jasper PW; James MT; Hoover AW; Muth ER
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Nov; 116(11):1785-1793. PubMed ID: 27346460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual cues and food intake: A preregistered replication of Wansink et al. (2005).
    Lopez A; Choi AK; Dellawar NC; Cullen BC; Avila Contreras S; Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Feb; 153(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 37917442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small food texture modifications can be used to change oral processing behaviour and to control ad libitum food intake.
    Mosca AC; Torres AP; Slob E; de Graaf K; McEwan JA; Stieger M
    Appetite; 2019 Nov; 142():104375. PubMed ID: 31326437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eating with a smaller spoon decreases bite size, eating rate and ad libitum food intake in healthy young males.
    James LJ; Maher T; Biddle J; Broom DR
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Oct; 120(7):830-837. PubMed ID: 30153875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeated consumption of a large volume of liquid and semi-solid foods increases ad libitum intake, but does not change expected satiety.
    Hogenkamp PS; Mars M; Stafleu A; de Graaf C
    Appetite; 2012 Oct; 59(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 22721908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation.
    Lasschuijt MP; Mars M; Stieger M; Miquel-Kergoat S; de Graaf C; Smeets P
    Physiol Behav; 2017 Jul; 176():76-83. PubMed ID: 28174138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiologic and Neural Controls of Eating.
    Moran TH; Ladenheim EE
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2016 Dec; 45(4):581-599. PubMed ID: 27837774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focused attention during eating enhanced memory for meal satiety but did not reduce later snack intake in men: A randomised within-subjects laboratory experiment.
    Whitelock V; Gaglione A; Davies-Owen J; Robinson E
    Appetite; 2019 May; 136():124-129. PubMed ID: 30690053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation.
    Forde CG; van Kuijk N; Thaler T; de Graaf C; Martin N
    Appetite; 2013 Jan; 60(1):208-219. PubMed ID: 23017464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of real-time vibrotactile feedback delivered through an augmented fork on eating rate, satiation, and food intake.
    Hermans RC; Hermsen S; Robinson E; Higgs S; Mars M; Frost JH
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():7-13. PubMed ID: 28192220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.