These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23372700)

  • 1. Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction.
    Zhu J; Murphy GL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54286. PubMed ID: 23372700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty in category-based induction: when do people integrate across categories?
    Murphy GL; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 20192530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eyetracking reveals multiple-category use in induction.
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1050-67. PubMed ID: 26727126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories.
    Griffiths O; Hayes BK; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):576-95. PubMed ID: 22060277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speeded induction under uncertainty: the influence of multiple categories and feature conjunctions.
    Newell BR; Paton H; Hayes BK; Griffiths O
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):869-74. PubMed ID: 21169582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size, number of categories and sampling assumptions: Exploring some differences between categorization and generalization.
    Hendrickson AT; Perfors A; Navarro DJ; Ransom K
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Jun; 111():80-102. PubMed ID: 30947074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction with uncertain categories: When do people consider the category alternatives?
    Hayes BK; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):730-43. PubMed ID: 19679854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.
    Van Gulick AE; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1307-20. PubMed ID: 24820671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study.
    Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):481-95. PubMed ID: 24092426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Category-based predictions: influence of uncertainty and feature associations.
    Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):736-53. PubMed ID: 8656154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: a critical analysis of similarity-based approaches.
    Noles NS; Gelman SA
    Dev Psychol; 2012 May; 48(3):890-6. PubMed ID: 22059447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analogical and category-based inference: a theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models.
    Holyoak KJ; Lee HS; Lu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):702-27. PubMed ID: 21038985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?
    Wasserman EA; Brooks DI; McMurray B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():99-122. PubMed ID: 25497520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unitization, similarity, and overt attention in categorization and exposure.
    Welham AK; Wills AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1518-33. PubMed ID: 21713562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature inference with uncertain categorization: Re-assessing Anderson's rational model.
    Konovalova E; Le Mens G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1666-1681. PubMed ID: 28924732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prior categorization can produce more efficient ordering.
    Kemp S; Grace RC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 25906066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noncategorical approaches to feature prediction with uncertain categories.
    Papadopoulos C; Hayes BK; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):304-18. PubMed ID: 21264571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.
    Bowman CR; Zeithamova D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1442-1464. PubMed ID: 32105147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit and explicit processes in category-based induction: is induction best when we don't think?
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):227-46. PubMed ID: 23506087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel Labels Increase Category Coherence, But Only When People Have the Goal to Coordinate.
    Suffill E; Branigan H; Pickering M
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12796. PubMed ID: 31742758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.