These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2337398)

  • 1. Factors affecting the precision of bone mineral measurements. Part 1: Review of experimentally derived results obtained from single photon absorptiometry.
    McDonald SP; Cormack J; Evill CA; Sage MR
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1990 Mar; 13(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 2337398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.
    Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
    Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of bone mass measurements by photon absorptiometry.
    Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):23-6. PubMed ID: 2517696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of regional bone mineral measurements obtained from total-body scans.
    LeBlanc AD; Schneider VS; Engelbretson DA; Evans HJ
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2295939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measurement of Phalangeal Bone Mineral Density on a Slot-Scanning Digital Radiography System.
    Dendere R; Potgieter JH; Steiner S; Whiley SP; Douglas TS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2850-9. PubMed ID: 26099139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.
    Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral content in newborns: validation of the technique.
    Braillon PM; Salle BL; Brunet J; Glorieux FH; Delmas PD; Meunier PJ
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Jul; 32(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 1635849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.
    Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements using a gamma camera.
    Valkema R; Prpic H; Blokland JA; Camps JA; Papapoulos SE; Bijvoet OL; Pauwels EK
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jan; 35(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8305272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine.
    von Wowern N; Storm TL; Olgaard K
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1988 Mar; 42(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 3130164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative measurements of bone mineral content using DPA and DPX--initial clinical experiences].
    Spitz J; Stoecker M; Clemenz N; Kempers B; Fischer M
    Rofo; 1990 Mar; 152(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 2157260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry.
    Borg J; Møllgaard A; Riis BJ
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 8800788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of bone mineral content by single-photon absorptiometry (125I). The effect of source strength].
    Cattaneo GM; Rinaldi GP; Rubinacci A
    Radiol Med; 1992; 83(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 1557545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry.
    Shepherd JA; Cheng XG; Lu Y; Njeh C; Toschke J; Engelke K; Grigorian M; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2002 Apr; 17(4):734-45. PubMed ID: 11918231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Cowen S; Freeman CP
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1908-21. PubMed ID: 9383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.