These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23374241)

  • 1. Estimation of breeding values for mean and dispersion, their variance and correlation using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Felleki M; Lee D; Lee Y; Gilmour AR; Rönnegård L
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Dec; 94(6):307-17. PubMed ID: 23374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance - estimation of variance components using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Rönnegård L; Felleki M; Fikse F; Mulder HA; Strandberg E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Mar; 42(1):8. PubMed ID: 20302616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components from field data for number of pigs born alive.
    See MT; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Nov; 71(11):2905-9. PubMed ID: 8270513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation study on covariance component estimation for two binary traits in an underlying continuous scale.
    Mäntysaari EA; Quaas RL; Gröhn YT
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 2045564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components.
    Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):363-70. PubMed ID: 19134071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methods to study uniformity of traits: Application to birth weight in pigs.
    Sell-Kubiak E; Bijma P; Knol EF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):900-11. PubMed ID: 26020868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of an approximate animal model for maternal and direct genetic effects of litter size in swine.
    Roehe R; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Dec; 71(12):3251-60. PubMed ID: 8294276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iteratively reweighted least squares mapping of quantitative trait loci.
    Xu S
    Behav Genet; 1998 Sep; 28(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 9926616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an animal model for across-herd genetic evaluation of number born alive in swine.
    Woodward BW; Mabry JW; See MT; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Aug; 71(8):2040-6. PubMed ID: 8376227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of genetic variance for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Mulder HA; Rönnegård L; Fikse WF; Veerkamp RF; Strandberg E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):23. PubMed ID: 23827014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection models for directional dominance: an example for litter size in pigs.
    Varona L; Legarra A; Herring W; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 29373954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of macro- and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity in unbalanced datasets.
    Madsen MD; van der Werf J; Börner V; Mulder HA; Clark S
    Animal; 2021 Dec; 15(12):100411. PubMed ID: 34837779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian inference of variance components for litter size in Rasa Aragonesa sheep.
    Altarriba J; Varona L; García-Cortés LA; Moreno C
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jan; 76(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 9464880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of genetic parameters for average daily gain using models with competition effects.
    Chen CY; Kachman SD; Johnson RK; Newman S; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2525-30. PubMed ID: 18539840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Theory, method and application of method R on estimation of (co)variance components].
    Liu WZ
    Yi Chuan; 2004 Jul; 26(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 15640057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full sib pens of pigs are not suitable to identify variance component of associative effect: a simulation study using Gibbs Sampling.
    Cheng J; Janssens S; Buys N
    BMC Genet; 2009 Feb; 10():9. PubMed ID: 19250536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic heteroscedasticity of teat count in pigs.
    Felleki M; Lundeheim N
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 25817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference.
    Van Tassell CP; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2586-97. PubMed ID: 8923173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic and non-genetic parameters related to embryo production in superovulated Large White (LW) gilts.
    Furstoss V; Berthelot F; Plat M; Venturi E; Royer E; Elleboudt F; Martinat-Botté F
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2012 Oct; 134(3-4):177-83. PubMed ID: 22939008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.