BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23374607)

  • 1. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.
    Perea M; Soares AP; Comesaña M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Sep; 116(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23374607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
    Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of Grade 3 and 4 children.
    Schmalz X; Marinus E; Castles A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 22905801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphological processing during visual word recognition in developing readers: evidence from masked priming.
    Beyersmann E; Castles A; Coltheart M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1306-26. PubMed ID: 22530670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context effects on orthographic learning of regular and irregular words.
    Wang HC; Castles A; Nickels L; Nation K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 May; 109(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 21315372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of word length and other sublexical, lexical, and semantic variables on developmental reading deficits.
    De Luca M; Barca L; Burani C; Zoccolotti P
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Dec; 21(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 19057172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of morphological Family Size for young readers.
    Perdijk K; Schreuder R; Baayen RH; Verhoeven L
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Sep; 30(Pt 3):432-45. PubMed ID: 22882372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese.
    Soares AP; Machado J; Costa A; Iriarte Á; Simões A; de Almeida JJ; Comesaña M; Perea M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):680-96. PubMed ID: 25263599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contextual diversity facilitates learning new words in the classroom.
    Rosa E; Tapia JL; Perea M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179004. PubMed ID: 28586354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.
    Plummer P; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):275-83. PubMed ID: 23937235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: evidence for a character-driven processing model.
    Miwa K; Libben G; Dijkstra T; Baayen H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 23713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.