242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23374923)
1. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography.
Jung YR; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Lee EH; Chang NY; Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 23374923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone density effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee MY; Park JH; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Cho JW; Chang NY; Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26827978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic micro-implants using cone beam computed tomography.
Min KI; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Lee EH; Chang NY; Chae JM
Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1014-21. PubMed ID: 22417652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporary anchorage devices.
Kau CH; English JD; Muller-Delgardo MG; Hamid H; Ellis RK; Winklemann S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):166.e1-5; discussion 166-7. PubMed ID: 20152667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density.
Watanabe H; Deguchi T; Hasegawa M; Ito M; Kim S; Takano-Yamamoto T
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Feb; 16(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 23311659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure?
Kim SH; Kang SM; Choi YS; Kook YA; Chung KR; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of tooth root contact on the stability of orthodontic anchor screws in the maxilla: Comparison between self-drilling and self-tapping methods.
Iwai H; Motoyoshi M; Uchida Y; Matsuoka M; Shimizu N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 25836008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of orthodontic miniplate anchoring screws in the posterior maxilla.
Kim GT; Kim SH; Choi YS; Park YJ; Chung KR; Suk KE; Choo H; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):628.e1-10; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 19892272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loss of anchorage of miniscrews: a 3-dimensional assessment.
El-Beialy AR; Abou-El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AM; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):700-7. PubMed ID: 19892288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kook YA; Bayome M; Trang VT; Kim HJ; Park JH; Kim KB; Behrents RG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Lim JE; Lee SJ; Kim YJ; Lim WH; Chun YS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.
Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
