These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23374926)
1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the craniomaxillary complex during maxillary protraction with bone anchorage vs conventional dental anchorage. Yan X; He W; Lin T; Liu J; Bai X; Yan G; Lu L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23374926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study. Moon W; Wu KW; MacGinnis M; Sung J; Chu H; Youssef G; Machado A Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of maxillary protraction with labiolingual arches and implants. Liu C; Zhu X; Zhang X Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):466-78. PubMed ID: 26321345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study. Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 19524831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction. Keles A; Tokmak EC; Erverdi N; Nanda R Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):387-96. PubMed ID: 12401046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yang IH; Chang YI; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Lim WH; Lee NK; Baek SH Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21740169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax. Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Drescher D World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress and displacement between maxillary protraction with miniplates placed at the infrazygomatic crest and the lateral nasal wall: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Lee NK; Baek SH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 22381495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal versus palatal plates: finite element analysis. Kim KY; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim KB; Mo SS; Kook YA Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 25090997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion. Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Three-dimensional finite element model of maxillary protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate]. Lei YH; Jian XC; Ren BQ Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Oct; 33(10):898-905. PubMed ID: 19001731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different reactive force direction of maxillary protraction on temporomandibular joint]. Dong R; Wang XX; Zhang WJ; Li J; Zheng DH; Zhang J Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):740-4. PubMed ID: 24495725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A finite element analysis of the maxillary first molar PDL with maxillary protraction in a mixed dentition Class III malocclusion. Tanaka OM; Araújo EA; Oliver DR; Behrents RG Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Nov; 18(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 26333535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis of sutural stresses. Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 19732670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A three-dimensional 3-D finite element study on direction of maxillary protraction]. Lin WJ; Zou M; Liu XL; Zheng YY Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Oct; 19(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 21161123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus. Zhang D; Zheng L; Wang Q; Lu L; Ma J Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Aug; 14():80. PubMed ID: 26285822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary protraction at early ages. The revolution of new bone anchorage appliances. Solano-Mendoza B; Iglesias-Linares A; Yañez-Vico RM; Mendoza-Mendoza A; Alió-Sanz JJ; Solano-Reina E J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 23534334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion. Lee SH; Koh SD; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]