These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23375171)

  • 1. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes.
    Christ TJ; Zopluoglu C; Monaghen BD; Van Norman ER
    J Sch Psychol; 2013 Feb; 51(1):19-57. PubMed ID: 23375171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of baseline estimation on the reliability, validity, and precision of CBM-R growth estimates.
    Van Norman ER; Christ TJ; Zopluoglu C
    Sch Psychol Q; 2013 Sep; 28(3):239-255. PubMed ID: 23937103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: A preliminary investigation of confidence interval overlap to detect reliable growth.
    Van Norman ER
    Sch Psychol Q; 2016 Sep; 31(3):405-418. PubMed ID: 26866285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of schedule frequency and density when monitoring progress with curriculum-based measurement.
    January SA; Van Norman ER; Christ TJ; Ardoin SP; Eckert TL; White MJ
    Sch Psychol Q; 2019 Jan; 34(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 30284886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding Curriculum-Based Measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules.
    Ardoin SP; Christ TJ; Morena LS; Cormier DC; Klingbeil DA
    J Sch Psychol; 2013 Feb; 51(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 23375170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examiner error in curriculum-based measurement of oral reading.
    Cummings KD; Biancarosa G; Schaper A; Reed DK
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Aug; 52(4):361-75. PubMed ID: 25107409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: a meta-analysis of the correlational evidence.
    Reschly AL; Busch TW; Betts J; Deno SL; Long JD
    J Sch Psychol; 2009 Dec; 47(6):427-69. PubMed ID: 19808123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of nonsense-word fluency and curriculum-based measurement of reading to measure response to phonics instruction.
    Van Norman ER; Nelson PM; Parker DC
    Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Dec; 33(4):573-581. PubMed ID: 29878810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early grade curriculum-based reading measures for students with intellectual disability.
    Hill DR; Lemons CJ
    J Intellect Disabil; 2015 Dec; 19(4):311-25. PubMed ID: 25759277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the reliability of Curriculum-Based Measurement: an application of Latent Growth Modeling.
    Yeo S; Kim DI; Branum-Martin L; Wayman MM; Espin CA
    J Sch Psychol; 2012 Apr; 50(2):275-92. PubMed ID: 22386124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of progress monitoring data from general outcome measures and specific subskill mastery measures for reading.
    Van Norman ER; Maki KE; Burns MK; McComas JJ; Helman L
    J Sch Psychol; 2018 Apr; 67():179-189. PubMed ID: 29571533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How accurate are interpretations of curriculum-based measurement progress monitoring data? Visual analysis versus decision rules.
    Van Norman ER; Christ TJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2016 Oct; 58():41-55. PubMed ID: 27586069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening.
    Kilgus SP; Methe SA; Maggin DM; Tomasula JL
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Aug; 52(4):377-405. PubMed ID: 25107410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical equating with measures of oral reading fluency.
    Albano AD; Rodriguez MC
    J Sch Psychol; 2012 Feb; 50(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 22386077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the consequential validity of early literacy progress monitoring data: An investigation of the accuracy of decision rules to evaluate response to instruction.
    Van Norman ER; Nelson PM
    Sch Psychol; 2019 Sep; 34(5):512-520. PubMed ID: 30883157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical adequacy of growth estimates from a computer adaptive test: Implications for progress monitoring.
    Van Norman ER; Nelson PM; Parker DC
    Sch Psychol Q; 2017 Sep; 32(3):379-391. PubMed ID: 27504817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of trend estimation method on forecasting curriculum-based measurement of reading performance.
    Van Norman ER; Nelson PM
    J Sch Psychol; 2019 Jun; 74():44-57. PubMed ID: 31213231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of curriculum-based measurement and teacher ratings of academic achievement.
    Kettler RJ; Albers CA
    J Sch Psychol; 2013 Aug; 51(4):499-515. PubMed ID: 23870444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous measurement of reading growth, gender, and relative-age effects: many-faceted Rasch applied to CBM reading scores.
    MacMillan P
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 12077464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How consistent are class size effects?
    Konstantopoulos S
    Eval Rev; 2011 Feb; 35(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 21362641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.