These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23376895)

  • 21. Vision and eye health: moving into the digital age with instrument-based vision screening.
    Nottingham Chaplin PK; Baldonado K; Hutchinson A; Moore B
    NASN Sch Nurse; 2015 May; 30(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 25870098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of Visual Acuity in Children Using Crowded Lea Symbol Charts.
    Sailoganathan A; Rou LX; Buja KA; Siderov J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Aug; 95(8):643-647. PubMed ID: 30063661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Determining visual acuity with LH symbols and Landolt rings].
    Gräf M; Becker R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 10483556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Poor correlation between "fix-follow-maintain" monocular/binocular fixation pattern evaluation and presence of functional amblyopia.
    Atilla H; Oral D; Coskun S; Erkam N
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11388880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Ramakrishnan B; Ravi A; SundarRaj M; Rakshit A; Nosofsky RM; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):964-971. PubMed ID: 37272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.
    Hamm LM; Langridge F; Black JM; Anstice NS; Vuki M; Fakakovikaetau T; Grant CC; Dakin SC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 31489704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Lea Symbols chart and Sheridan Gardiner chart in assessing vision screening among pre-school children: a Malaysia perspective.
    Omar R; Hussin DA; Knight VF
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 22550841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of the Lea symbols chart for screening Nigerian children aged 3 to 5 years.
    Obajolowo TS; Olatunji FO; Ademola-Popoola DS; Popoola GO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Oct; 23(10):1381-1386. PubMed ID: 33047694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
    Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible? Comparison between the Lea Symbol chart and the HVOT (LM) chart.
    Kvarnström G; Jakobsson P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 15715562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preschool visual acuity screening tests.
    Friendly DS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1978; 76():383-480. PubMed ID: 754379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Children unable to perform screening tests in vision in preschoolers study: proportion with ocular conditions and impact on measures of test accuracy.
    Maguire MG;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 17197520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.
    Farassat N; Jehle V; Heinrich SP; Lagrèze WA; Bach M
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 38502142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test.
    Bailey IL; Jackson AJ; Minto H; Greer RB; Chu MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1257-64. PubMed ID: 22842307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual acuity results in school-aged children and adults: Lea Symbols chart versus Bailey-Lovie chart.
    Dobson V; Maguire M; Orel-Bixler D; Quinn G; Ying GS;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 80(9):650-4. PubMed ID: 14502046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.