These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23376898)

  • 1. Screening subclinical keratoconus with placido-based corneal indices.
    Ramos-López D; Martínez-Finkelshtein A; Castro-Luna GM; Burguera-Gimenez N; Vega-Estrada A; Piñero D; Alió JL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 90(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 23376898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Placido-based indices of corneal irregularity.
    Ramos-López D; Martínez-Finkelshtein A; Castro-Luna GM; Piñero D; Alió JL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1220-31. PubMed ID: 21765370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
    Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining Placido and Corneal Wavefront Data for the Detection of Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Saad A; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 32(8):510-6. PubMed ID: 27505311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations.
    Bühren J; Kühne C; Kohnen T
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 17317387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
    Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system.
    Montalbán R; Alió JL; Javaloy J; Piñero DP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 23218818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust keratoconus detection with Bayesian network classifier for Placido-based corneal indices.
    Castro-Luna GM; Martínez-Finkelshtein A; Ramos-López D
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Aug; 43(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 31866403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentacam.
    Bae GH; Kim JR; Kim CH; Lim DH; Chung ES; Chung TY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):103-109.e1. PubMed ID: 24452012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal enantiomorphism in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Saad A; Guilbert E; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Aug; 30(8):542-7. PubMed ID: 25325895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.
    Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus.
    Tummanapalli SS; Potluri H; Vaddavalli PK; Sangwan VS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2205-14. PubMed ID: 26703297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between corneal elevation maps using different reference surfaces with Scheimpflug-Placido topographer.
    Mostafa EM
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):553-558. PubMed ID: 27469194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus.
    Saad A; Gatinel D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):2978-92. PubMed ID: 22427590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability.
    Labiris G; Gatzioufas Z; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Kozobolis V; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e258-62. PubMed ID: 23557430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
    Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence and characteristics of unilateral keratoconus classified on corneal topography.
    Wei RH; Zhao SZ; Lim L; Tan DT
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 27(10):745-51. PubMed ID: 21563729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.