649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23377445)
61. Corticospinal control of wrist muscles during expectation of a motor perturbation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Meziane HB; Spieser L; Pailhous J; Bonnard M
Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19073218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Muscle-specific variations in use-dependent crossed-facilitation of corticospinal pathways mediated by transcranial direct current (DC) stimulation.
Carson RG; Kennedy NC; Linden MA; Britton L
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18582535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The effect of lumbosacral manipulation on corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability on asymptomatic participants.
Fryer G; Pearce AJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Feb; 35(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 22036580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Changes in tibialis anterior corticospinal properties after acute prolonged muscle vibration.
Farabet A; Souron R; Millet GY; Lapole T
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Jun; 116(6):1197-205. PubMed ID: 27113961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Handedness is mainly associated with an asymmetry of corticospinal excitability and not of transcallosal inhibition.
De Gennaro L; Cristiani R; Bertini M; Curcio G; Ferrara M; Fratello F; Romei V; Rossini PM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1305-12. PubMed ID: 15134697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Changes in corticospinal transmission following 8weeks of ankle joint immobilization.
Leukel C; Taube W; Rittweger J; Gollhofer A; Ducos M; Weber T; Lundbye-Jensen J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jan; 126(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 24794515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. A reappraisal of pain-paired associative stimulation suggesting motor inhibition at spinal level.
Gavaret M; Ayache SS; Mylius V; Mhalla A; Chalah MA; Lefaucheur JP
Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Oct; 48(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 29753579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans.
Yamaguchi T; Beck MM; Therkildsen ER; Svane C; Forman C; Lorentzen J; Conway BA; Lundbye-Jensen J; Geertsen SS; Nielsen JB
Physiol Rep; 2020 Aug; 8(16):e14531. PubMed ID: 32812363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked potentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles.
Kido Thompson A; Stein RB
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(4):491-500. PubMed ID: 15243732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.
Bocci T; Marceglia S; Vergari M; Cognetto V; Cogiamanian F; Sartucci F; Priori A
J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):440-6. PubMed ID: 25925328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Stimulus strength related effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on maximal voluntary contraction force of human quadriceps femoris muscle.
Urbach D; Awiszus F
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11797081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system.
Jensen JL; Marstrand PC; Nielsen JB
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Oct; 99(4):1558-68. PubMed ID: 15890749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Induction of cortical plastic changes in wrist muscles by paired associative stimulation in the recovery phase of stroke patients.
Castel-Lacanal E; Marque P; Tardy J; de Boissezon X; Guiraud V; Chollet F; Loubinoux I; Moreau MS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 May; 23(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19060132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Motor cortex and corticospinal excitability in humans with a history of illicit stimulant use.
Flavel SC; White JM; Todd G
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Nov; 113(9):1486-94. PubMed ID: 22961269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction.
Kaneko F; Hayami T; Aoyama T; Kizuka T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():94. PubMed ID: 24902891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Potentiating paired corticospinal-motoneuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury.
Bunday KL; Urbin MA; Perez MA
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 29848448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Male human motor cortex stimulus-response characteristics are not altered by aging.
Smith AE; Sale MV; Higgins RD; Wittert GA; Pitcher JB
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2011 Jan; 110(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 21071590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Corticospinal Plasticity in Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices Induced by Paired Associative Stimulation to the Dominant Hemisphere Does Not Differ between Young and Older Adults.
Dickins DSE; Kamke MR; Sale MV
Neural Plast; 2017; 2017():8319049. PubMed ID: 29147586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Motor excitability evaluation in developmental stuttering: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Busan P; D'Ausilio A; Borelli M; Monti F; Pelamatti G; Pizzolato G; Fadiga L
Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):781-92. PubMed ID: 22225881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
