These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23377887)
1. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions based on population or individual endpoints. Beaudouin R; Péry AR Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Apr; 32(5):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23377887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria. Dyer SD; Versteeg DJ; Belanger SE; Chaney JG; Raimondo S; Barron MG Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 42(8):3076-83. PubMed ID: 18497169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advancing Fifth Percentile Hazard Concentration Estimation Using Toxicity-Normalized Species Sensitivity Distributions. Dhond AK; Barron MG Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(23):17188-17196. PubMed ID: 36410104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aquatic plants: Test species sensitivity and minimum data requirement evaluations for chemical risk assessments and aquatic life criteria development for the USA. Lewis M; Thursby G Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():270-280. PubMed ID: 29573709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials. Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Species Sensitivity Distributions of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Fludioxonil-Spiked Sediment Toxicity Tests. Sun J; Xiao PF; Yin XH; Zhang K; Zhu GN; Brock TCM Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2022 May; 82(4):569-580. PubMed ID: 35460350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models. Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aquatic risk assessment of a novel strobilurin fungicide: A microcosm study compared with the species sensitivity distribution approach. Chen L; Song Y; Tang B; Song X; Yang H; Li B; Zhao Y; Huang C; Han X; Wang S; Li Z Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Oct; 120():418-27. PubMed ID: 26122735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems. Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Derivation of freshwater quality criteria for zinc using interspecies correlation estimation models to protect aquatic life in China. Feng CL; Wu FC; Dyer SD; Chang H; Zhao XL Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):1177-83. PubMed ID: 23058200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aquatic acute species sensitivity distributions of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles. Adam N; Schmitt C; De Bruyn L; Knapen D; Blust R Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 526():233-42. PubMed ID: 25933293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating population-level HC5 for copper using a species sensitivity distribution approach. Iwasaki Y; Hayashi TI; Kamo M Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1396-402. PubMed ID: 23417717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing aquatic risk assessment methods for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides metribuzin and metamitron. Brock TC; Crum SJ; Deneer JW; Heimbach F; Roijackers RM; Sinkeldam JA Environ Pollut; 2004 Aug; 130(3):403-26. PubMed ID: 15182972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of specific versus literature species sensitivity distributions for herbicides risk assessment. Larras F; Gregorio V; Bouchez A; Montuelle B; Chèvre N Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(4):3042-52. PubMed ID: 26396014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of in silico development of aquatic toxicity species sensitivity distributions. Barron MG; Jackson CR; Awkerman JA Aquat Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 116-117():1-7. PubMed ID: 22459408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Maltby L; Blake N; Brock TC; van den Brink PJ Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 15719998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Derivation of water quality criteria of phenanthrene using interspecies correlation estimation models for aquatic life in China. Wu J; Liu Z; Yan Z; Yi X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Jun; 22(12):9457-63. PubMed ID: 25608455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: II. Pyrethroid insecticides. Fojut TL; Palumbo AJ; Tjeerdema RS Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012; 216():51-103. PubMed ID: 22298113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute-to-chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation. Duboudin C; Ciffroy P; Magaud H Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Jul; 23(7):1774-85. PubMed ID: 15230330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]