These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23378870)

  • 1. Optimal False Discovery Rate Control for Dependent Data.
    Xie J; Cai TT; Maris J; Li H
    Stat Interface; 2011; 4(4):417-430. PubMed ID: 23378870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False Discovery Control in Large-Scale Spatial Multiple Testing.
    Sun W; Reich BJ; Cai TT; Guindani M; Schwartzman A
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2015 Jan; 77(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 25642138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating False Discovery Proportion Under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence.
    Fan J; Han X; Gu W
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2012; 107(499):1019-1035. PubMed ID: 24729644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal design for high-throughput screening via false discovery rate control.
    Feng T; Basu P; Sun W; Ku HT; Mack WJ
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2816-2827. PubMed ID: 30924183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size and power analysis for sparse signal recovery in genome-wide association studies.
    Xie J; Cai TT; Li H
    Biometrika; 2011 Jun; 98(2):273-290. PubMed ID: 23049128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FarmTest: Factor-adjusted robust multiple testing with approximate false discovery control.
    Fan J; Ke Y; Sun Q; Zhou WX
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2019; 114(528):1880-1893. PubMed ID: 33033420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighted False Discovery Rate Control in Large-Scale Multiple Testing.
    Basu P; Cai TT; Das K; Sun W
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2018; 113(523):1172-1183. PubMed ID: 31011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Joint testing and false discovery rate control in high-dimensional multivariate regression.
    Xia Y; Cai TT; Li H
    Biometrika; 2018 Jun; 105(2):249-269. PubMed ID: 30799872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False Discovery Rate Control With Groups.
    Hu JX; Zhao H; Zhou HH
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2010 Sep; 105(491):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 21931466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modifying the false discovery rate procedure based on the information theory under arbitrary correlation structure and its performance in high-dimensional genomic data.
    Rastaghi S; Saki A; Tabesh H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57. PubMed ID: 38317067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
    Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal likelihood-ratio multiple testing with application to Alzheimer's disease and questionable dementia.
    Lee D; Kang H; Kim E; Lee H; Kim H; Kim YK; Lee Y; Lee DS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jan; 15():9. PubMed ID: 25633500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling the joint local false discovery rate is more powerful than meta-analysis methods in joint analysis of summary statistics from multiple genome-wide association studies.
    Jiang W; Yu W
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):500-507. PubMed ID: 28011772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the false discovery proportion with unknown dependence.
    Fan J; Han X
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2017 Sep; 79(4):1143-1164. PubMed ID: 29056863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL LONGITUDINAL DATA.
    Fang EX; Ning Y; Li R
    Ann Stat; 2020 Oct; 48(5):2622-2645. PubMed ID: 34267407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple Testing of Submatrices of a Precision Matrix with Applications to Identification of Between Pathway Interactions.
    Xia Y; Cai T; Cai TT
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2018; 113(521):328-339. PubMed ID: 29881130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative trait Loci analysis using the false discovery rate.
    Benjamini Y; Yekutieli D
    Genetics; 2005 Oct; 171(2):783-90. PubMed ID: 15956674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.