BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23379201)

  • 1. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
    Ohno S;
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
    Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Greiner JV; Udell IJ
    Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
    Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Turner D
    Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
    Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.
    Fujishima H; Ohashi Y; Takamura E
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25163405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A 10-week safety and efficacy evaluation of olopatadine, 0.2% instilled twice-daily in patients with allergic conjunctivitis in Japan].
    Ohno S; Ando M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Sep; 116(9):869-79. PubMed ID: 23092094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loteprednol etabonate suspension 0.2% administered QID compared with olopatadine solution 0.1% administered BID in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients.
    Gong L; Sun X; Qu J; Wang L; Zhang M; Zhang H; Wang L; Gu Y; Elion-Mboussa A; Roy L; Zhu B
    Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1259-1272.e1. PubMed ID: 22627057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
    Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
    Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of olopatadine, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity, using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Sep; 81(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 9759796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
    Abelson MB; Spitalny L
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of once-daily olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution compared to twice-daily olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Abelson MB; Spangler DL; Epstein AB; Mah FS; Crampton HJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2007 Dec; 32(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18085465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of preservative-free ketotifen fumarate and preserved olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Mortemousque B; Bourcier T; Khairallah M; Messaoud R; Brignole-Baudouin F; Renault D; Rebika H; Brémond-Gignac D;
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24388379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.