532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23379476)
1. Preoperative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging is useful for planning the treatment of an enlarged uterus by total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Hatta K; Terai Y; Okuda K; Nakamura Y; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Hayashi A; Yamashita Y; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Apr; 39(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 23379476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus coagulation of uterine arteries (CUA) at their origin plus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the management of myoma and adenomyosis.
Pan HS; Ko ML; Huang LW; Chang JZ; Hwang JL; Chen SC
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 18850461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.
Shiota M; Kotani Y; Umemoto M; Tobiume T; Shimaoka M; Hoshiai H
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Nov; 4(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 22776300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Rong CH; Shen K; Lang JH; Yang JX; Wu M; Pan LY; Leng JH
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 29(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 17633474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Kim DH; Bae DH; Hur M; Kim SH
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 Aug; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 9668147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopy hysterectomy (TLH) in women with benign disease of uterus--a prospective randomized study].
Drahonovský J; Pán M; Baresová S; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 Dec; 71(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 17236400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Bergamini V; Uccella S; Beretta P; Franchi M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 16527713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Bonilla DJ; Mains L; Whitaker R; Crawford B; Finan M; Magnus M
J Reprod Med; 2007 Jun; 52(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 17694966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.
Ark C; Güngördük K; Celebi I; Celikkol O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19184075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams.
Kim HB; Song JE; Kim GH; Cho HY; Lee KY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Jun; 36(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 20598052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uterus weighing exceeding 500 grams: technique and initial report.
Song T; Kim TJ; Kim MK; Park H; Kim JS; Lee YY; Kim CJ; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 20471918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
Hobson DT; Imudia AN; Al-Safi ZA; Shade G; Kruger M; Diamond MP; Awonuga AO
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1353-61. PubMed ID: 22124531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
Jaturasrivilai P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 17596034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].
Tan XJ; Lang JH; Shen K; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Leng JH; Zhu L
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 25(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 12974083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study.
Daraï E; Soriano D; Kimata P; Laplace C; Lecuru F
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 1):712-6. PubMed ID: 11339921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking.
Chang WC; Torng PL; Huang SC; Sheu BC; Hsu WC; Chen RJ; Chow SN; Chang DY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 16036194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
