193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23379630)
1. Development of a diagnostic test set to assess agreement in breast pathology: practical application of the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS).
Oster NV; Carney PA; Allison KH; Weaver DL; Reisch LM; Longton G; Onega T; Pepe M; Geller BM; Nelson HD; Ross TR; Tosteson AN; Elmore JG
BMC Womens Health; 2013 Feb; 13():3. PubMed ID: 23379630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.
Kottner J; Audigé L; Brorson S; Donner A; Gajewski BJ; Hróbjartsson A; Roberts C; Shoukri M; Streiner DL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 21130355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: findings of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme. U. K. National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology.
Sloane JP; Ellman R; Anderson TJ; Brown CL; Coyne J; Dallimore NS; Davies JD; Eakins D; Ellis IO; Elston CW
Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(10):1414-9. PubMed ID: 7833094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.
Samples LS; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Nelson HD; Morgan TR; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():34-43. PubMed ID: 28475933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of ductal lesions of breast].
Di F; Wong NL
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 39(7):467-72. PubMed ID: 21055176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Onega T; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953. PubMed ID: 28465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility and validity of pathologic classifications of benign breast disease and implications for clinical applications.
Bodian CA; Perzin KH; Lattes R; Hoffmann P
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(12):3908-13. PubMed ID: 8508356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: diagnostic agreement and management implications.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2016 Nov; 69(5):862-870. PubMed ID: 27270947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of scoring system in classification of proliferative breast disease on fine needle aspiration cytology.
Mridha AR; Iyer VK; Kapila K; Verma K
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 49(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 17001879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria.
Schnitt SJ; Connolly JL; Tavassoli FA; Fechner RE; Kempson RL; Gelman R; Page DL
Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 Dec; 16(12):1133-43. PubMed ID: 1463092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer variability in reporting of breast lesions.
Beck JS
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Dec; 38(12):1358-65. PubMed ID: 3001153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
