194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23379630)
41. Inter-observer reproducibility of classical lobular neoplasia (B3 lesions) in preoperative breast biopsies: a study of the Swiss Working Group of breast and gynecopathologists.
Moskovszky L; Berger B; Fleischmann A; Friedrich T; Helmchen B; Körner M; Rau TT; Varga Z
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Jun; 146(6):1473-1478. PubMed ID: 32232656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Interobserver variability in the classification of proliferative breast lesions by fine-needle aspiration: results of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Study.
Sidawy MK; Stoler MH; Frable WJ; Frost AR; Masood S; Miller TR; Silverberg SG; Sneige N; Wang HH
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Feb; 18(2):150-65. PubMed ID: 9484645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fine needle aspiration of the breast. A probabilistic approach to diagnosis of carcinoma.
Wang HH; Ducatman BS
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 9568124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Interobserver reproducibility in diagnosis of breast lesions. A panel in Puglia (Italy). GSBioCaM.
Giardina C; Clemente R; Fusilli S; Bianchi S; Paradiso A
Tumori; 1998; 84(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 9678616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reproducibility of histological diagnoses and diagnostic accuracy of non palpable breast lesions.
Bianchi S; Palli D; Galli M; Arisio B; Cappa A; Dal Forno S; Coggi G; Fiaccavento S; Gagliano E; Magni E
Pathol Res Pract; 1994 Jan; 190(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 8065991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Results of reference pathology in mammography screening].
Kreipe HH; Höfler H; Lebeau A; Pickartz H; Schmidt D
Pathologe; 2008 Nov; 29 Suppl 2():178-80. PubMed ID: 18841364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists from 12 countries in diagnosing breast disease and reporting prognostic features of carcinomas. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology.
Sloane JP; Amendoeira I; Apostolikas N; Bellocq JP; Bianchi S; Boecker W; Bussolati G; Coleman D; Connolly CE; Eusebi V; De Miguel C; Dervan P; Drijkoningen R; Elston CW; Faverly D; Gad A; Jacquemier J; Lacerda M; Martinez-Penuela J; Munt C; Peterse JL; Rank F; Sylvan M; Tsakraklides V; Zafrani B
Virchows Arch; 1999 Jan; 434(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10071228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.
Schuh F; Biazús JV; Resetkova E; Benfica CZ; Ventura Ade F; Uchoa D; Graudenz M; Edelweiss MI
Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():93. PubMed ID: 26159429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Immunohistochemistry increases the accuracy of diagnosis of benign papillary lesions in breast core needle biopsy specimens.
Shah VI; Flowers CI; Douglas-Jones AG; Dallimore NS; Rashid M
Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):683-91. PubMed ID: 16681684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of in situ epithelial cell proliferation in the breast.
Sneige N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 May; 113(5 Suppl 1):S38-48. PubMed ID: 11993709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Histological features associated with diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: illustrative cases from the B-Path study.
Allison KH; Rendi MH; Peacock S; Morgan T; Elmore JG; Weaver DL
Histopathology; 2016 Dec; 69(6):1028-1046. PubMed ID: 27398812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pathologic review of atypical hyperplasia identified by image-guided breast needle core biopsy. Correlation with excision specimen.
Yeh IT; Dimitrov D; Otto P; Miller AR; Kahlenberg MS; Cruz A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 127(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12521366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Current issues in diagnostic breast pathology.
Walker RA; Hanby A; Pinder SE; Thomas J; Ellis IO;
J Clin Pathol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):771-85. PubMed ID: 22813732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The contribution of cytologic imprints of stereotactically guided core needle biopsies of the breast in the management of patients with mammographic abnormalities.
Green RS; Mathew S
Breast J; 2001; 7(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 11678797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prognostic significance of benign proliferative breast disease.
Bodian CA; Perzin KH; Lattes R; Hoffmann P; Abernathy TG
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(12):3896-907. PubMed ID: 8389654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images.
Dundar MM; Badve S; Bilgin G; Raykar V; Jain R; Sertel O; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 58(7):1977-84. PubMed ID: 21296703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy and consistency in application of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine needle aspiration.
Ayata G; Abu-Jawdeh GM; Fraser JL; Garcia LW; Upton MP; Wang HH
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(6):973-8. PubMed ID: 14674065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diagnostic agreement in the evaluation of image-guided breast core needle biopsies: results from a randomized clinical trial.
Collins LC; Connolly JL; Page DL; Goulart RA; Pisano ED; Fajardo LL; Berg WA; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ; Schnitt SJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Jan; 28(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 14707874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Diagnostic difficulties and limits in breast histopathology in core biopsies (breast microbiopsies)].
Bellocq JP; Zafrani B; Chenard MP
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 9754388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
