These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23379645)
1. Estimation of false discovery rate using sequential permutation p-values. Bancroft T; Du C; Nettleton D Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23379645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data. Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments. Gao X Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence. Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis. Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution. van de Wiel MA; Kim KI Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies. Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'miss rate' for the analysis of gene expression data. Taylor J; Tibshirani R; Efron B Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15618531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments. Yang H; Churchill G Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures. Lu X; Perkins DL BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate. Pounds S; Cheng C Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data. Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies. Wojcik J; Forner K Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To permute or not to permute. Huang Y; Xu H; Calian V; Hsu JC Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2244-8. PubMed ID: 16870938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data. Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. Varma S; Simon R BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies. Datta S; Datta S Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis. Jung SH Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis. Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies. Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]