157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23379933)
41. A comparison of variability and population structure for major histocompatibility complex and microsatellite loci in California coastal steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum).
Aguilar A; Garza JC
Mol Ecol; 2006 Apr; 15(4):923-37. PubMed ID: 16599957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Spatial partitioning and asymmetric hybridization among sympatric coastal steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus), coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki) and interspecific hybrids.
Ostberg CO; Slatton SL; Rodriguez RJ
Mol Ecol; 2004 Sep; 13(9):2773-88. PubMed ID: 15315688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors.
Araki H; Blouin MS
Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16262861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Tracking genetic diversity in a large-scale oyster restoration program: effects of hatchery propagation and initial characterization of diversity on restored vs. wild reefs.
Hornick KM; Plough LV
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Aug; 123(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 30833745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf (Canis lupus) population.
Liberg O; Andrén H; Pedersen HC; Sand H; Sejberg D; Wabakken P; Kesson M; Bensch S
Biol Lett; 2005 Mar; 1(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 17148117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
Heath DD; Busch C; Kelly J; Atagi DY
Mol Ecol; 2002 Feb; 11(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 11856422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Genetic rescue and inbreeding depression in Mexican wolves.
Fredrickson RJ; Siminski P; Woolf M; Hedrick PW
Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Sep; 274(1623):2365-71. PubMed ID: 17609180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Genetic structure and relationships among steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations in British Columbia.
Heath DD; Pollard S; Herbinger C
Heredity (Edinb); 2001 May; 86(Pt 5):618-27. PubMed ID: 11554978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Modelling problems in conservation genetics using Drosophila: consequences of fluctuating population sizes.
Woodworth LM; Montgomery ME; Nurthen RK; Briscoe DA; Frankham R
Mol Ecol; 1994 Aug; 3(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 7921363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse.
Höglund J; Piertney SB; Alatalo RV; Lindell J; Lundberg A; Rintamäki PT
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 269(1492):711-5. PubMed ID: 11934362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genomic analysis reveals depression due to both individual and maternal inbreeding in a free-living mammal population.
Bérénos C; Ellis PA; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3152-68. PubMed ID: 27135155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations.
Sánchez L; Bijma P; Woolliams JA
Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1589-95. PubMed ID: 12930762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reproductive performance in houbara bustard is affected by the combined effects of age, inbreeding and number of generations in captivity.
Rabier R; Lesobre L; Robert A
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7813. PubMed ID: 33837276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effective size of nonrandom mating populations.
Caballero A; Hill WG
Genetics; 1992 Apr; 130(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 1582565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Estimation of microsatellite-based autozygosity and its correlation with pedigree inbreeding coefficient in crossbred cattle.
Elavarasan K; Kumar S; Agarwal S; Vani A; Sharma R; Kumar S; Chauhan A; Sahoo NR; Verma MR; Gaur GK
Anim Biotechnol; 2023 Dec; 34(8):3564-3577. PubMed ID: 36811467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches.
Keller LF; Grant PR; Grant BR; Petren K
Evolution; 2002 Jun; 56(6):1229-39. PubMed ID: 12144022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Genetic effective size of a wild primate population: influence of current and historical demography.
Storz JF; Ramakrishnan U; Alberts SC
Evolution; 2002 Apr; 56(4):817-29. PubMed ID: 12038539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. No evidence of inbreeding depression in sperm performance traits in wild song sparrows.
Losdat S; Germain RR; Nietlisbach P; Arcese P; Reid JM
Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 8(3):1842-1852. PubMed ID: 29435258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of d2, a microsatellite measure of inbreeding and outbreeding, in wolves with a known pedigree.
Hedrick P; Fredrickson R; Ellegren H
Evolution; 2001 Jun; 55(6):1256-60. PubMed ID: 11475062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The evolution of trade-offs: effects of inbreeding on fecundity relationships in the cricket Gryllus firmus.
Roff DA; DeRose MA
Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 11263732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
