These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23380058)

  • 1. Recovery of human DNA profiles from poached deer remains part 2: improved recovery protocol without the need for LCN analysis.
    Tobe SS; Bailey S; Govan J; Welch LA
    Sci Justice; 2013 Mar; 53(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23380058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recovery of human DNA profiles from poached deer remains: a feasibility study.
    Tobe SS; Govan J; Welch LA
    Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):190-5. PubMed ID: 22137052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic genetic SNP typing of low-template DNA and highly degraded DNA from crime case samples.
    Børsting C; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23523365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two methods for isolating DNA from human skeletal remains for STR analysis.
    Rucinski C; Malaver AL; Yunis EJ; Yunis JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 22212010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number (LCN) DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci.
    Kloosterman AD; Kersbergen P
    J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 15005516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two whole genome amplification methods for STR genotyping of LCN and degraded DNA samples.
    Ballantyne KN; van Oorschot RA; Mitchell RJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Feb; 166(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16687226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Individual identification of fallow deer using microsatellite polymorphism in a case of poaching]].
    Poetsch M; Philipp KP; Seefeldt S; Maschke M
    Arch Kriminol; 2000; 206(3-4):110-7. PubMed ID: 11126585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-time forensic DNA analysis at a crime scene using a portable microchip analyzer.
    Liu P; Yeung SH; Crenshaw KA; Crouse CA; Scherer JR; Mathies RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 19083840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Forensic analysis of LCN DNA using sample concentration methods followed by miniSTR genotyping].
    Gu LH; Dong Y; Zhang C; Xu Y; Chen RH; Hu W; Chen LK; Zhou HG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 26(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 21287741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of keratinised hair. Part 2. An optimised genomic DNA extraction procedure reveals donor dependence of STR profiles.
    McNevin D; Wilson-Wilde L; Robertson J; Kyd J; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15998572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization and validation of a fast amplification protocol for AmpFlSTR® Profiler Plus® for rapid forensic human identification.
    Laurin N; Frégeau C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 21397581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental validation of the PowerPlex(®) ESI 16 and PowerPlex(®) ESI 17 Systems: STR multiplexes for the new European standard.
    Tucker VC; Hopwood AJ; Sprecher CJ; McLaren RS; Rabbach DR; Ensenberger MG; Thompson JM; Storts DR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):436-48. PubMed ID: 21071297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
    Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Study on application of the whole genome amplification in LCN].
    Zhou HG; Zhang C
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 22(1):43-4, 47. PubMed ID: 16524185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Powerplex® ES versus Powerplex® S5--casework testing of the new screening kit.
    Poetsch M; Kamphausen T; Bajanowski T; Schwark T; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20457034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
    Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prevalence of mixed DNA profiles in fingernail samples taken from couples who co-habit using autosomal and Y-STRs.
    Malsom S; Flanagan N; McAlister C; Dixon L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 19215872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated extraction of DNA from biological stains on fabric from crime cases. A comparison of a manual and three automated methods.
    Stangegaard M; Hjort BB; Hansen TN; Hoflund A; Mogensen HS; Hansen AJ; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 23333808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the performance of whole genome amplification for use in low template DNA typing.
    Lee JC; Tsai LC; Lai PY; Lee CC; Lin CY; Huang TY; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Med Sci Law; 2012 Oct; 52(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 22875794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.