These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23380060)

  • 1. Optimisation of choline testing using Florence Iodine reagent, including comparative sensitivity and specificity with PSA and AP tests.
    Hardinge P; Allard J; Wain A; Watson S
    Sci Justice; 2013 Mar; 53(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 23380060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase for detection of semen in vaginal swabs from raped women.
    Peonim V; Worasuwannarak W; Sujirachato K; Teerakamchai S; Srisont S; Udnoon J; Chudoung U
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Aug; 20(6):578-81. PubMed ID: 23910836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of three rapid detection methods for the forensic identification of seminal fluid in rape cases.
    Khaldi N; Miras A; Botti K; Benali L; Gromb S
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 15317189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the BioSign PSA membrane test for the identification of semen stains in forensic casework.
    Maher J; Vintiner S; Elliot D; Melia L
    N Z Med J; 2002 Feb; 115(1147):48-9. PubMed ID: 11942515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test assays for the forensic identification of seminal fluid.
    Hochmeister MN; Budowle B; Rudin O; Gehrig C; Borer U; Thali M; Dirnhofer R
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):1057-60. PubMed ID: 10486959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the use of a commercially available kit for the identification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in semen stains.
    Simich JP; Morris SL; Klick RL; Rittenhouse-Diakun K
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 10582360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved detection of semen by use of direct acid phosphatase testing.
    Lewis J; Baird A; McAlister C; Siemieniuk A; Blackmore L; McCabe B; O'Rourke P; Parekh R; Watson E; Wheelhouse M; Wilson N
    Sci Justice; 2013 Dec; 53(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 24188339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Identification of semen in bloodstains with the use of alternative light source and biochemical screening tests].
    Gorzkiewicz M; Woźniak M; Grzybowski T; Łuczak S; Linkowska K; Daca P
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2008; 58(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 19441689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship of spermatoscopy, prostatic acid phosphatase activity and prostate-specific antigen (p30) assays with further DNA typing in forensic samples from rape cases.
    Romero-Montoya L; Martínez-Rodríguez H; Pérez MA; Argüello-García R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):111-8. PubMed ID: 20692115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of human semenogelin in membrane strip test as an alternative method for the detection of semen.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jun; 169(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16949235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of prostate specific antigen by ELISA.
    Johnson ED; Kotowski TM
    J Forensic Sci; 1993 Mar; 38(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 7681096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of an enzymatic choline determination for the identification of semen in casework samples.
    Noppinger K; Morrison R; Jones NH; Hopkins H
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 Jul; 32(4):1069-74. PubMed ID: 3612062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of prostate-specific antigen and spermatozoa from a mixture of semen and simulated gastric juice.
    McWilliams S; Gartside B
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):610-1. PubMed ID: 19302387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. White light reflectance spectroscopy biosensing system for fast quantitative prostate specific antigen determination in forensic samples.
    Koukouvinos G; Metheniti A; Karachaliou CE; Goustouridis D; Livaniou E; Misiakos K; Raptis I; Kondili A; Miniati P; Petrou P; Kakabakos S
    Talanta; 2017 Dec; 175():443-450. PubMed ID: 28842014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semen searching when sperm is absent.
    Martínez P; Santiago B; Alcalá B; Atienza I
    Sci Justice; 2015 Mar; 55(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 25753997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods used in the UK and Ireland for the extraction and detection of semen on swabs and cloth samples.
    Allard JE; Baird A; Davidson G; Jones S; Lewis J; McKenna L; Weston C; Scrimger D; Teppett G
    Sci Justice; 2007 Dec; 47(4):160-7. PubMed ID: 18229757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic value of PSA and AP tests for the detection of spermatozoa in postmortem swabs from the genital and anal region in males.
    Weitzig L; Schroeder AS; Augustin C; Raupach T; Sehner S; Anders S
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 25387394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reaction in post-mortem rectal swabs: a cautionary note.
    Lunetta P; Sippel H
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(7):397-9. PubMed ID: 19733329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An autopsy report case of rape victim by the application of PSA test kit as a new innovation for sexual assault investigation in Thailand.
    Talthip J; Chirachariyavej T; Peonim AV; Atamasirikul K; Teerakamchai S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):348-51. PubMed ID: 17375642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative studies of the practical use of different sperm samples].
    Scheithauer R; Luta C
    Arch Kriminol; 1988; 181(1-2):41-9. PubMed ID: 2896492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.