These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23381064)
1. Nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection: a randomized prospective study. Aslanian HR; Shieh FK; Chan FW; Ciarleglio MM; Deng Y; Rogart JN; Jamidar PA; Siddiqui UD Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 23381064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lee CK; Park DI; Lee SH; Hwangbo Y; Eun CS; Han DS; Cha JM; Lee BI; Shin JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Nov; 74(5):1094-102. PubMed ID: 21889137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy. Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. de Brouwer EJ; Arbouw ME; van der Zwet WC; van Herwaarden MA; Ledeboer M; Jansman FG; ter Borg F Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 22317882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy--a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis. Rastogi A; Bansal A; Wani S; Callahan P; McGregor DH; Cherian R; Sharma P Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Feb; 67(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 18155210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced polyp detection as endoscopy shift progresses: experience with screening colonoscopy at a tertiary-care hospital. Long MD; Martin C; Sandler RS; Herfarth HH; Shaheen NJ; Dellon ES J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011 Mar; 45(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 21085007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?]. Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse observers: feasible and safe? Kanna S; Hassan T Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1368. PubMed ID: 23912410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist. Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. Biecker E; Floer M; Heinecke A; Ströbel P; Böhme R; Schepke M; Meister T J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015; 49(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 24921209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate. Patel VD; Thompson WK; Lapin BR; Goldstein JL; Yen EF Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3084-3090. PubMed ID: 29974376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial. East JE; Bassett P; Arebi N; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Saunders BP Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 20950801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD; Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial. Tribonias G; Theodoropoulou A; Konstantinidis K; Vardas E; Karmiris K; Chroniaris N; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e260-6. PubMed ID: 19930146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]