These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23382325)

  • 1. Comparison study of central blood pressure and wave reflection obtained from tonometry-based devices.
    Zhang Y; Agnoletti D; Safar ME; Wang JG; Topouchian J; Xu Y; Protogerou AD; Blacher J
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 23382325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pressure wave shape comparison between two non-invasive tonometric devices].
    Agnoletti D; Millasseau S; Topouchian J; Zhang Y; Safar ME; Blacher J
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2013 Jun; 62(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23721987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulse wave analysis with two tonometric devices: a comparison study.
    Agnoletti D; Millasseau SC; Topouchian J; Zhang Y; Safar ME; Blacher J
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Sep; 35(9):1837-48. PubMed ID: 25154391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system.
    Kang JH; Lee DI; Kim S; Kim SW; Im SI; Na JO; Choi CU; Lim HE; Kim JW; Kim EJ; Han SW; Rha SW; Seo HS; Oh DJ; Park CG
    Hypertens Res; 2012 Mar; 35(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22158112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of noninvasive assessments of central blood pressure using general transfer function and late systolic shoulder of the radial pressure wave.
    Wohlfahrt P; Krajcoviechová A; Seidlerová J; Mayer O; Filipovsky J; Cífková R
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23999585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a new non-invasive portable tonometer for determining arterial pressure wave and pulse wave velocity: the PulsePen device.
    Salvi P; Lio G; Labat C; Ricci E; Pannier B; Benetos A
    J Hypertens; 2004 Dec; 22(12):2285-93. PubMed ID: 15614022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
    Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Li Y; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Wang JG
    J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23188416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of methodologies for pulse wave velocity estimation.
    Salvi P; Magnani E; Valbusa F; Agnoletti D; Alecu C; Joly L; Benetos A
    J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Oct; 22(10):669-77. PubMed ID: 18528411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment.
    Stea F; Bozec E; Millasseau S; Khettab H; Boutouyrie P; Laurent S
    J Hypertens; 2014 Apr; 32(4):873-80. PubMed ID: 24509122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of central pressure augmentation using automated radial artery tonometry.
    Melenovsky V; Borlaug BA; Fetics B; Kessler K; Shively L; Kass DA
    J Hypertens; 2007 Jul; 25(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 17563562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the SphygmoCor XCEL device with applanation tonometry for pulse wave velocity and central blood pressure assessment in youth.
    Stabouli S; Printza N; Zervas C; Dotis J; Chrysaidou K; Maliahova O; Antza C; Papachristou F; Kotsis V
    J Hypertens; 2019 Jan; 37(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 29939943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph.
    Rajzer MW; Wojciechowska W; Klocek M; Palka I; Brzozowska-Kiszka M; Kawecka-Jaszcz K
    J Hypertens; 2008 Oct; 26(10):2001-7. PubMed ID: 18806624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large artery stiffness and pulse wave reflection: results of a population-based study.
    Filipovský J; Tichá M; Cífková R; Lánská V; Stastná V; Roucka P
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15823947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Shahin Y; Barakat H; Barnes R; Chetter I
    Hypertens Res; 2013 Mar; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 23034469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].
    Chemaly E; London G; Benetos A; Darné B; Asmar R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2002; 95(7-8):637-40. PubMed ID: 12365071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of central blood pressure devices on the basis of a modified protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: application to the Centron cBP301.
    Agnoletti D; Millasseau S; Topouchian J; Safar ME; Blacher J
    Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 24418970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.