These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23383694)

  • 1. A comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging-derived measurements in patients with cervical cancer.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Yeung IW
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2013 Mar; 33(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 23383694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for patient dose reduction in dynamic contrast enhanced CT study.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Jaffray DA; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5094-103. PubMed ID: 21978055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved accuracy of quantitative parameter estimates in dynamic contrast-enhanced CT study with low temporal resolution.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Jaffray DA; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):388. PubMed ID: 26745932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of quantitative parameters in cervix cancer measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT.
    Yang C; Stadler WM; Karczmar GS; Milosevic M; Yeung I; Haider MA
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 20512864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interindividual variability of arterial impulse response to intravenous injection of nonionic contrast agent (Iohexol) in DCE-CT study.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4791-802. PubMed ID: 19928109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DCE-MRI of locally-advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Tofts analysis versus non-model-based analyses.
    Lund KV; Simonsen TG; Kristensen GB; Rofstad EK
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 32293487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of cervical cancers predict chemoradiotherapy outcome.
    Andersen EK; Hole KH; Lund KV; Sundfør K; Kristensen GB; Lyng H; Malinen E
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 23333024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.
    Zhang J; Freed M; Winters K; Kim SG
    MAGMA; 2015 Dec; 28(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 26239630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions.
    Heye T; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Bashir MR; Merkle EM; Boll DT
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 23220897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment--a preliminary study.
    Kim JH; Lee JM; Park JH; Kim SC; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 23192779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
    Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT.
    Korporaal JG; van den Berg CA; van Osch MJ; Groenendaal G; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Nov; 66(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 21604291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advanced solid tumors treated with cediranib: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and CT as markers of vascular activity.
    Messiou C; Orton M; Ang JE; Collins DJ; Morgan VA; Mears D; Castellano I; Papadatos-Pastos D; Brunetto A; Tunariu N; Mann H; Tessier J; Young H; Ghiorghiu D; Marley S; Kaye SB; deBono JS; Leach MO; deSouza NM
    Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 22891356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.
    Donaldson SB; West CM; Davidson SE; Carrington BM; Hutchison G; Jones AP; Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 20187179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pancreatic cancer: utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessment of antiangiogenic therapy.
    Akisik MF; Sandrasegaran K; Bu G; Lin C; Hutchins GD; Chiorean EG
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 20515976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.