These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23383694)

  • 41. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
    He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On the potential use of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as radiomic features of cervical cancer.
    Lu Y; Peng W; Song J; Chen T; Wang X; Hou Z; Yan Z; Koh TS
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5098-5109. PubMed ID: 31523829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantification of DCE-MRI: pharmacokinetic parameter ratio between TOI and RR in reference region model.
    Lee J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2837-40. PubMed ID: 21095706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. High temporal resolution 3D gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging of renal tumors with pharmacokinetic modeling: preliminary observations.
    Chandarana H; Amarosa A; Huang WC; Kang SK; Taneja S; Melamed J; Kim S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):802-8. PubMed ID: 23389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV
    Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Correlations between dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived measures of tumor microvasculature and interstitial fluid pressure in patients with cervical cancer.
    Haider MA; Sitartchouk I; Roberts TP; Fyles A; Hashmi AT; Milosevic M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 17173303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of early response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Park JJ; Kim CK; Park SY; Simonetti AW; Kim E; Park BK; Huh SJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24970025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Extended graphical model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Chen H; Li F; Zhao X; Yuan C; Rutt B; Kerwin WS
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):868-78. PubMed ID: 21394770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. SU-D-BRB-06: Comprehensive Population-Averaged Arterial Input Function (AIF) for DCE-MRI of Head and Neck Cancer.
    Onxley J; Yoo D; Muradyan N; MacFall J; Brizel D; Craciunescu O
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3615-3616. PubMed ID: 28517386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gadopentetate dimeglumine and FDG uptake in liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma as determined with MR imaging and PET.
    van Laarhoven HW; de Geus-Oei LF; Wiering B; Lok J; Rijpkema M; Kaanders JH; Krabbe PF; Ruers T; Punt CJ; van der Kogel AJ; Oyen WJ; Heerschap A
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 16183932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
    Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
    Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison between perfusion computed tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer.
    Kierkels RG; Backes WH; Janssen MH; Buijsen J; Beets-Tan RG; Lambin P; Lammering G; Oellers MC; Aerts HJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jun; 77(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 19733445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of transvascular and cellular-interstitial water exchange on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging estimates of blood to tissue transfer constant and blood plasma volume.
    Paudyal R; Poptani H; Cai K; Zhou R; Glickson JD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 23197427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. T2*-correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI from double-echo acquisitions.
    Kleppestø M; Larsson C; Groote I; Salo R; Vardal J; Courivaud F; Bjørnerud A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 24123598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases.
    Shukla-Dave A; Lee N; Stambuk H; Wang Y; Huang W; Thaler HT; Patel SG; Shah JP; Koutcher JA
    BMC Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19351382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary study of the correlations between quantitative parameters and the clinical stage.
    Chikui T; Kitamoto E; Kami Y; Kawano S; Kobayashi K; Kamitani T; Obara M; Yoshiura K
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 88(1050):20140814. PubMed ID: 25906295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reference region-based pharmacokinetic modeling in quantitative dynamic contract-enhanced MRI allows robust treatment monitoring in a rat liver tumor model despite cardiovascular changes.
    Steingoetter A; Svensson J; Kosanke Y; Botnar RM; Schwaiger M; Rummeny E; Braren R
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jan; 65(1):229-38. PubMed ID: 20872863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant K
    Dickie BR; Rose CJ; Kershaw LE; Withey SB; Carrington BM; Davidson SE; Hutchison G; West CML
    Br J Cancer; 2017 May; 116(11):1436-1443. PubMed ID: 28449009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the metastatic potential of tumors: a preclinical study of cervical carcinoma and melanoma xenografts.
    Øvrebø KM; Ellingsen C; Hompland T; Rofstad EK
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 22671573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.