These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23384222)

  • 1. To twist, roll, stroke or poke? A study of input devices for menu navigation in the cockpit.
    Stanton NA; Harvey C; Plant KL; Bolton L
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(4):590-611. PubMed ID: 23384222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems.
    Harvey C; Stanton NA; Pickering CA; McDonald M; Zheng P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jul; 54(7):609-25. PubMed ID: 21770749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of input device and motion type on a cursor-positioning task.
    Yau YJ; Hwang SL; Chao CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 18459358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived vs. measured effects of advanced cockpit systems on pilot workload and error: are pilots' beliefs misaligned with reality?
    Casner SM
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):448-56. PubMed ID: 19028379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment.
    Baldus T; Patterson P
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 18295185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments.
    Coutts LV; Plant KL; Smith M; Bolton L; Parnell KJ; Arnold J; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2019 Feb; 62(2):286-304. PubMed ID: 30470162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posture and discomfort assessment in computer users while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.
    Kargar N; Choobineh AR; Razeghi M; Keshavarzi S; Meftahi N
    Work; 2018; 59(3):341-349. PubMed ID: 29630576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter.
    Levulis SJ; DeLucia PR; Kim SY
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1117-1129. PubMed ID: 30063411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation.
    Goode N; Lenné MG; Salmon P
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):986-96. PubMed ID: 22676650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated cockpits special report, part 1.
    Aviat Week Space Technol; 1995 Jan; 142(5):52-65. PubMed ID: 11542397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of touchscreen gesture's type and direction on finger-touch input performance and subjective ratings.
    Jeong H; Liu Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1528-1539. PubMed ID: 28357929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitts' law on the flight deck: evaluating touchscreens for aircraft tasks in actual flight scenarios.
    Xie Y; Zhou R; Qu J
    Ergonomics; 2023 Apr; 66(4):506-523. PubMed ID: 35786415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distributed representation as a principle for the analysis of cockpit information displays.
    Zhang J
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1997; 7(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 11541073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of touchscreen versus keyboard/mouse interaction for large screen process control displays.
    Noah B; Li J; Rothrock L
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Oct; 64():1-13. PubMed ID: 28610809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation considers the human factors.
    Arbak CJ; Derenski PA; Walrath LC
    Aerosp Am; 1993 Oct; 31(10):38-41. PubMed ID: 11541031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: performance and musculoskeletal loading issues.
    Dennerlein JT; Yang MC
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 11592668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing usability and trainability of indirect touch interaction: perspective for the next generation of air traffic control systems.
    Causse M; Alonso R; Vachon F; Parise R; Orliaguet JP; Tremblay S; Terrier P
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(11):1616-27. PubMed ID: 25050968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lessons from another industry: aviation, usability, and medical device design.
    Miller CA
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2013; Suppl():40-4. PubMed ID: 24111770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic health record on the go: Device form factor and Fitts' law.
    Drews FA; Zadra JR; Gleed J
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Mar; 111():37-44. PubMed ID: 29425632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human Factors Evaluation of the Universal Anaesthesia Machine: Assessing Equipment with High-Fidelity Simulation Prior to Deployment in a Resource-Constrained Environment.
    Sampson JB; Lee BH; Koka R; Chima AM; Jackson EV; Ogbuagu OO; Tran TP; Rosen MA
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2019 Oct; 111(5):490-499. PubMed ID: 31078287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.