182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23384240)
1. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM.
Turner-Stokes L; Siegert RJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2013; 35(22):1885-95. PubMed ID: 23384240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Neurological Impairment Scale: reliability and validity as a predictor of functional outcome in neurorehabilitation.
Turner-Stokes L; Thu A; Williams H; Casey R; Rose H; Siegert RJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 23721497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM): Psychometric Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Specialist Rehabilitation following a Stroke from the National UK Clinical Dataset.
Nayar M; Vanderstay R; Siegert RJ; Turner-Stokes L
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147288. PubMed ID: 26824696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The UK FIM+FAM Extended Activities of Daily Living module: evaluation of scoring accuracy and reliability.
Law J; Fielding B; Jackson D; Turner-Stokes L
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(10):825-30. PubMed ID: 19037776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of intensive outpatient neuro-rehabilitation outcomes using FIM+FAM(UK).
Wilson FC; Wheatley-Smith L; Downes C
NeuroRehabilitation; 2009; 24(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19597276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staged residential post-acute rehabilitation for adults following acquired brain injury: A comparison of functional gains rated on the UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM) and the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4).
Jackson D; Seaman K; Sharp K; Singer R; Wagland J; Turner-Stokes L
Brain Inj; 2017; 31(11):1405-1413. PubMed ID: 28898132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation?
Hobart JC; Lamping DL; Freeman JA; Langdon DW; McLellan DL; Greenwood RJ; Thompson AJ
Neurology; 2001 Aug; 57(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 11524472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Factor Analysis of Functional Independence and Functional Assessment Measure Scores Among Focal and Diffuse Brain Injury Patients: The Importance of Bifactor Models.
Gunn S; Burgess GH; Maltby J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 99(9):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 29715437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident.
Miki E; Yamane S; Yamaoka M; Fujii H; Ueno H; Kawahara T; Tanaka K; Tamashiro H; Inoue E; Okamoto T; Kuriyama M
Scand J Occup Ther; 2016 Sep; 23(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 26463478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment scale: a psychometric analysis from a large multicentre neurorehabilitation dataset.
Alexandrescu R; Siegert RJ; Turner-Stokes L
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(21):1976-83. PubMed ID: 25598001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.
Seel RT; Wright G; Wallace T; Newman S; Dennis L
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2007; 22(5):267-77. PubMed ID: 17878768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing activities of daily living using FIM-FAM scoring system before starting adjuvant treatment in patients with brain tumors: results from a prospective study.
Dutta D; Vanere P; Gupta T; Munshi A; Jalali R
J Neurooncol; 2009 Aug; 94(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 19255726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the Spanish adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure + Functional Assessment Measure.
Colomer C; Llorens R; Sánchez C; Ugart P; Moliner B; Navarro MD; Noé E; Ferri J
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2023 Aug; 59(4):452-457. PubMed ID: 37226445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population.
Gerrard P; Goldstein R; Divita MA; Ryan CM; Mix J; Niewczyk P; Kazis L; Kowalske K; Zafonte R; Schneider JC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1521-1526.e4. PubMed ID: 23473701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The UK FIM+FAM: development and evaluation. Functional Assessment Measure.
Turner-Stokes L; Nyein K; Turner-Stokes T; Gatehouse C
Clin Rehabil; 1999 Aug; 13(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 10460115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke.
Naghdi S; Ansari NN; Raji P; Shamili A; Amini M; Hasson S
Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25885666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program.
Donaghy S; Wass PJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Oct; 79(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 9779676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM).
McPherson KM; Pentland B; Cudmore SF; Prescott RJ
Disabil Rehabil; 1996 Jul; 18(7):341-7. PubMed ID: 8799674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.
Houlden H; Edwards M; McNeil J; Greenwood R
Clin Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 20(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 16541936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis.
Hawley CA; Taylor R; Hellawell DJ; Pentland B
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1999 Dec; 67(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 10567491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
