BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23384468)

  • 1. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
    Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
    Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
    Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
    Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
    Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
    Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
    Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions.
    Lu R; Xiao Y; Liu M; Shi D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 24658946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results.
    Navarro B; Ubeda B; Vallespí M; Wolf C; Casas L; Browne JL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21357553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
    Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification of breast tumors using elastographic and B-mode features: comparison of automatic selection of representative slice and physician-selected slice of images.
    Moon WK; Chang SC; Chang JM; Cho N; Huang CS; Kuo JW; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1147-57. PubMed ID: 23562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic value of (99m)Tc-3PRGD2 scintimammography for differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: Comparison of visual and semi-quantitative analysis.
    Chen Q; Xie Q; Zhao M; Chen B; Gao S; Zhang H; Xing H; Ma Q
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 26574690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Li Z; Sun J; Zhang J; Hu D; Wang Q; Peng K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 24315390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements.
    Yoon JH; Ko KH; Jung HK; Lee JT
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2199-204. PubMed ID: 24041435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
    Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.