56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23384829)
1. A novel miniaturized most probable number method for the enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from poultry-associated matrices.
Chenu JW; Pavic A; Cox JM
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Apr; 93(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 23384829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A validated miniaturized MPN method, based on ISO 6579:2002, for the enumeration of Salmonella from poultry matrices.
Pavic A; Groves PJ; Bailey G; Cox JM
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 109(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 20059618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of ISO 10272:2006 standard versus alternative enrichment and plating combinations for enumeration and detection of Campylobacter in chicken meat.
Habib I; Uyttendaele M; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 28(6):1117-23. PubMed ID: 21645809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat.
Seliwiorstow T; De Zutter L; Houf K; Botteldoorn N; Baré J; Van Damme I
Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 234():60-64. PubMed ID: 27391222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of four protocols for the detection and isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter from different matrices.
Ugarte-Ruiz M; Gómez-Barrero S; Porrero MC; Alvarez J; García M; Comerón MC; Wassenaar TM; Domínguez L
J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 113(1):200-8. PubMed ID: 22533742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation by interlaboratory trials of EN ISO 10272 - Microbiology of the food chain - Horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. - Part 1: Detection method.
Biesta-Peters EG; Jongenburger I; de Boer E; Jacobs-Reitsma WF
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 288():39-46. PubMed ID: 29934105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17993378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in a subset of intensive poultry flocks in Ireland.
Patriarchi A; Maunsell B; O'Mahony E; Fox A; Fanning S; Buckley J; Bolton DJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 49(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 19552774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of novel agars for the enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in poultry retail samples.
Ahmed R; León-Velarde CG; Odumeru JA
J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Feb; 88(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 22226753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of different culture methods for the recovery of Campylobacter species from pets.
Acke E; McGill K; Golden O; Jones BR; Fanning S; Whyte P
Zoonoses Public Health; 2009 Nov; 56(9-10):490-5. PubMed ID: 19243565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics and comparative performance of direct culture, direct PCR and enumeration methods for detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in broiler caeca.
Rodgers JD; Lawes JR; Vidal AB; Ellis-Iversen J; Ridley A; Pleydell EJ; Powell LF; Toszeghy M; Stapleton K; Clifton-Hadley FA
Vet Microbiol; 2012 Oct; 159(3-4):390-6. PubMed ID: 22565009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of supplemented buffered peptone water for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from broiler retail products.
Oyarzabal OA; Backert S; Nagaraj M; Miller RS; Hussain SK; Oyarzabal EA
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Apr; 69(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 17257696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different sampling techniques and enumeration methods for the isolation and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in raw retail chicken legs.
Scherer K; Bartelt E; Sommerfeld C; Hildebrandt G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three methods for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chilled or frozen meat.
Paulsen P; Kanzler P; Hilbert F; Mayrhofer S; Baumgartner S; Smulders FJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 103(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 15985304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method for isolation of Campylobacter spp. from environmental samples, involving sample processing, and blood- and antibiotic-free medium.
Baserisalehi M; Bahador N; Kapadnis BP
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 15357735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different isolation protocols on detection and molecular characterization of Campylobacter from poultry.
Ugarte-Ruiz M; Wassenaar TM; Gómez-Barrero S; Porrero MC; Navarro-Gonzalez N; Domínguez L
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 57(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 23837671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Miniaturized Most Probable Number and Enrichment Serology Technique for the Enumeration of Salmonella spp. on Poultry Carcasses.
Humbert FS; Salvat G; Lalande F; Colin P
J Food Prot; 1997 Nov; 60(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 31207776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of Escherichia coli from raw poultry in Belgium and impact on the detection of Campylobacter jejuni using Bolton broth.
Jasson V; Sampers I; Botteldoorn N; López-Gálvez F; Baert L; Denayer S; Rajkovic A; Habib I; De Zutter L; Debevere J; Uyttendaele M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 135(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19786312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in pig feces by direct real-time PCR with an internal control of extraction and amplification.
Leblanc-Maridor M; Garénaux A; Beaudeau F; Chidaine B; Seegers H; Denis M; Belloc C
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Apr; 85(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 21277341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR.
Lund M; Nordentoft S; Pedersen K; Madsen M
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Nov; 42(11):5125-32. PubMed ID: 15528705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
