411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23385060)
1. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
Berry JH
Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
Lamy D; Yashar A
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
Lamy D; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
Wykowska A; Schubö A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized.
Zehetleitner M; Goschy H; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):941-57. PubMed ID: 22506778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orientation search is mediated by distractor suppression: evidence from priming of pop-out.
Lamy D; Yashar A; Ruderman L
Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():29-35. PubMed ID: 23380440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
Kerzel D; Barras C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
Xu Y
J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection.
Becker SI; Ansorge U
Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():18-28. PubMed ID: 23478194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The allocation of attention in displays with simultaneously presented singletons.
Akyürek EG; Schubö A
Biol Psychol; 2011 May; 87(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 21406208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
Dalton P; Lavie N
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
Burra N; Kerzel D
Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
