These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23385539)

  • 1. Test for normality of the gene expression data.
    Shokirov B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 972():193-208. PubMed ID: 23385539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using of normalizations for gene expression analysis.
    Bubelíny P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 972():73-83. PubMed ID: 23385532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ranking analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes.
    Qi Y; Sun H; Sun Q; Pan L
    Genomics; 2011 May; 97(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 21402142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size calculations based on ranking and selection in microarray experiments.
    Matsui S; Zeng S; Yamanaka T; Shaughnessy J
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 17680829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A class of models for analyzing GeneChip gene expression analysis array data.
    Fan W; Pritchard JI; Olson JM; Khalid N; Zhao LP
    BMC Genomics; 2005 Feb; 6():16. PubMed ID: 15710039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-part permutation tests for DNA methylation and microarray data.
    Neuhäuser M; Boes T; Jöckel KH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():35. PubMed ID: 15725357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
    de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple hypothesis testing: a methodological overview.
    Almudevar A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 972():37-55. PubMed ID: 23385530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AnovArray: a set of SAS macros for the analysis of variance of gene expression data.
    Hennequet-Antier C; Chiapello H; Piot K; Degrelle S; Hue I; Renard JP; Rodolphe F; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():150. PubMed ID: 15960854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates.
    Chen DT; Chen JJ; Soong SJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2861-6. PubMed ID: 15814562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To permute or not to permute.
    Huang Y; Xu H; Calian V; Hsu JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2244-8. PubMed ID: 16870938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
    Matsui S; Noma H
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In silico microdissection of microarray data from heterogeneous cell populations.
    Lähdesmäki H; Shmulevich L; Dunmire V; Yli-Harja O; Zhang W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():54. PubMed ID: 15766384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.