243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2338665)
1. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro.
Mathis RS; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite laminate Class V restorations.
McInnes P; Perkins E; Weinberg R
Am J Dent; 1990 Feb; 3(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2375848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
Mason PN; Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations.
Gordon M; Wasserstein A; Gorfil C; Imber S
J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 18(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2037937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study.
Guelmann M; Fuks AB; Holan G; Grajower R
ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2503551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage at the gingival margin of class II composite restorations with glass-ionomer liner.
Hembree JH
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 2915330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner.
Puckett A; Fitchie J; Hembree J; Smith J
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):186-91. PubMed ID: 1289865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on microleakage in composite restorations with glass ionomer liners.
Arcoria CJ; Gonzalez JP; Vitasek BA; Wagner MJ
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1533870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
