219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387239)
1. Impedance cardiography for monitoring changes in cardiac output.
Parashar R; Bajpai M; Goyal M; Singh S; Tiwari S; Narayan VS
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 23387239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography.
Fellahi JL; Caille V; Charron C; Deschamps-Berger PH; Vieillard-Baron A
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1553-9. PubMed ID: 19372335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in healthy young humans: comparison between Modelflow method and Doppler echocardiography method.
Sugawara J; Tanabe T; Miyachi M; Yamamoto K; Takahashi K; Iemitsu M; Otsuki T; Homma S; Maeda S; Ajisaka R; Matsuda M
Acta Physiol Scand; 2003 Dec; 179(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 14656373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of cardiac output during constant exercises: comparison of two non-invasive techniques.
Tordi N; Mourot L; Matusheski B; Hughson RL
Int J Sports Med; 2004 Feb; 25(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 14986199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac™/Vigileo™ and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery.
Kim JY; Kim BR; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim JH; Lee SI; Kim KT; Choe WJ; Park JS; Kim JW
J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23803309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement between preload reserve measured by impedance cardiography and echocardiography during pregnancy.
Liang H; Vårtun Å; Acharya G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 298(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 29623416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation: inert gas rebreathing and impedance cardiography.
Osbak PS; Henriksen JH; Kofoed KF; Jensen GB
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2011 Jul; 71(4):304-13. PubMed ID: 21391778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output during exercise by inductance cardiography.
Kaplan V; Bucklar GB; Bloch KE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 12750583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating changes in cardiac output using an implanted hemodynamic monitor in heart failure patients.
Ståhlberg M; Damgaard M; Ersgård D; Norsk P; Karamanoglu M; Linde C; Braunschweig F
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2010 Aug; 44(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 20450462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Therapeutic optimization of atrioventricular delay in cardiosurgical ICU patients by noninvasive cardiac output measurements versus pulse contour analysis.
Mellert F; Lindner P; Schiller W; Gersing E; Heinze I; Kreuz J; Welz A; Preusse CJ
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 56(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 18615372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler.
Lorne E; Mahjoub Y; Diouf M; Sleghem J; Buchalet C; Guinot PG; Petiot S; Kessavane A; Dehedin B; Dupont H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 24871872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of impedance cardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Panagiotou M; Vogiatzis I; Jayasekera G; Louvaris Z; Mackenzie A; Mcglinchey N; Baker JS; Church AC; Peacock AJ; Johnson MK
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Mar; 38(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28168802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of cardiac output during exercise. Transthoracic impedance vs. heart rate alone.
Horstmann E; Könn B
Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8052172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transthoracic impedance cardiography: a noninvasive method of hemodynamic assessment.
Bayram M; Yancy CW
Heart Fail Clin; 2009 Apr; 5(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 19249685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients.
Kemps HM; Thijssen EJ; Schep G; Sleutjes BT; De Vries WR; Hoogeveen AR; Wijn PF; Doevendans PA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Dec; 105(6):1822-9. PubMed ID: 18948448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
