These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387239)

  • 41. Holter-type impedance cardiography device. A system for continuous and non-invasive monitoring of cardiac haemodynamics.
    Cybulski G; Koźluk E; Michalak E; Niewiadomski W; Piatkowska A
    Kardiol Pol; 2004 Aug; 61(8):138-46. PubMed ID: 15457280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cardiac output in normal pregnancy measured by impedance cardiography.
    Myhrman P; Granerus G; Karlsson K; Lundgren Y
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1982 Oct; 42(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 7156865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow(R)] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.
    Taylor K; Manlhiot C; McCrindle B; Grosse-Wortmann L; Holtby H
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Apr; 114(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 22314693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cardiac output measurement during exercise in COPD: A comparison of dye dilution and impedance cardiography.
    Louvaris Z; Spetsioti S; Andrianopoulos V; Chynkiamis N; Habazettl H; Wagner H; Zakynthinos S; Wagner PD; Vogiatzis I
    Clin Respir J; 2019 Apr; 13(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 30724023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Validation of impedance cardiography measurements of cardiac output during limited exercise in heart transplant recipients.
    Pepke-Zaba J; Higenbottam TW; Dinh Xuan AT; Scott JP; English TA; Wallwork J
    Transpl Int; 1990 Jul; 3(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2206215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Impedance cardiography--non-invasive measurement of central hemodynamic data].
    Petersen JR; Jensen BV; Olsen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Jan; 154(5):255-60. PubMed ID: 1736457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impedance cardiography derived cardiac output in hemodialysis patients: a study of reproducibility and comparison with echocardiography.
    Karakitsos DN; Patrianakos AP; Paraskevopoulos A; Parthenakis FI; Tzenakis N; Fourtounas C; Daphnis EK; Vardas PE
    Int J Artif Organs; 2006 Jun; 29(6):564-72. PubMed ID: 16841284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance with acetylene uptake for measuring cardiac output.
    Wang E; Cruz C; Pettersen MR; Hoff J; Helgerud J
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 35(11):925-32. PubMed ID: 24886928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
    Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
    Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correlation of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with advanced heart failure: the BioImpedance CardioGraphy (BIG) substudy of the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) Trial.
    Kamath SA; Drazner MH; Tasissa G; Rogers JG; Stevenson LW; Yancy CW
    Am Heart J; 2009 Aug; 158(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 19619697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Non-invasive estimate of cardiac output during exercise based on impedance cardiography and oxygen uptake in the elderly.
    Rodrigues MN; Vanfraechem JH; Farinatti Pde T
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 88(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 17364123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.
    Jakovljevic DG; Moore S; Hallsworth K; Fattakhova G; Thoma C; Trenell MI
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Apr; 26(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 22234400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impedance cardiography revisited.
    Cotter G; Schachner A; Sasson L; Dekel H; Moshkovitz Y
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Sep; 27(9):817-27. PubMed ID: 16868348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output.
    Trinkmann F; Berger M; Doesch C; Papavassiliu T; Schoenberg SO; Borggrefe M; Kaden JJ; Saur J
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Aug; 30(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 26115774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device.
    Richard R; Lonsdorfer-Wolf E; Charloux A; Doutreleau S; Buchheit M; Oswald-Mammosser M; Lampert E; Mettauer B; Geny B; Lonsdorfer J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Aug; 85(3-4):202-7. PubMed ID: 11560071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the "direct" Fick method.
    Charloux A; Lonsdorfer-Wolf E; Richard R; Lampert E; Oswald-Mammosser M; Mettauer B; Geny B; Lonsdorfer J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Jul; 82(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 10958374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Validation during exercise of a new device for cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time (comparison EsCCO(®) vs. Physioflow(®))].
    Stalter A; Lanot N; Bridon G; Julian V; Péreira B; Richard R
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2016 Feb; 65(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25704727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of impedance cardiography with indirect Fick (CO2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exercise.
    Pianosi P; Garros D
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 8651127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.