336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387301)
1. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Hardness of Novel Experimental Vinyl Poly Siloxane (VPS) Impression Materials with Commercially Available Ones.
Ud Din S; Chaudhary FA; Ahmed B; Alam MK; Parker S; Patel M; Javed MQ
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1703869. PubMed ID: 35187157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Erbe C; Wöstmann B
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.
Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface Detail Reproduction and Effect of Disinfectant and Long-Term Storage on the Dimensional Stability of a Novel Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Material.
Nassar U; Chow AK
J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):494-8. PubMed ID: 25522249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative surface detail reproduction for elastomeric impression materials: Study on reproducibility performance.
Varvara G; Sinjari B; Bernardi S; Turkyilmaz I; Malvezzi V; Piattelli M; Caputi S
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 33435664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
