These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387301)

  • 41. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the contact angle of water on set elastomeric impression materials.
    Nassar U; Tavoossi F; Pan YW; Milavong-Viravongsa N; Heo G; Nychka JA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2018 May; 84():i6. PubMed ID: 31199723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18589071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of contemporary retraction agents and cleaning with hydrogen peroxide on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vohra F; Altokhais F; Thafrah AB; Alsaif K; Alyahya A; Alsahhaf A; AlFawaz YF; Aali KA; Abduljabbar T; Aldeeb M
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800019891072. PubMed ID: 31986959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of a new elastomeric impression material for complete-arch dental implant impressions.
    Baig MR; Buzayan MM; Yunus N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 May; 9(2):e12320. PubMed ID: 29349910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
    Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Medium-viscosity polyether impression material: a case report.
    Ritter AV; Swift EJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Nov; 21(11):993-6, 998, 1000, passim; quiz 1006. PubMed ID: 11968150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Volatilization of components from and water absorption of polyether impressions.
    Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Endo T
    J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 16150526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Sadan A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):310. PubMed ID: 16121746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.