BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387731)

  • 1. Motion as a perturbation: measurement-guided dose estimates to moving patient voxels during modulated arc deliveries.
    Feygelman V; Stambaugh C; Zhang G; Hunt D; Opp D; Wolf TK; Nelms BE
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021708. PubMed ID: 23387731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motion as perturbation. II. Development of the method for dosimetric analysis of motion effects with fixed-gantry IMRT.
    Nelms BE; Opp D; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061704. PubMed ID: 24877799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient.
    Nelms BE; Opp D; Robinson J; Wolf TK; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4228-38. PubMed ID: 22830756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 4D dose simulation in volumetric arc therapy: Accuracy and affecting parameters.
    Sothmann T; Gauer T; Werner R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172810. PubMed ID: 28231337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments.
    Poulsen PR; Schmidt ML; Keall P; Worm ES; Fledelius W; Hoffmann L
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6237-46. PubMed ID: 23039659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen.
    Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 4D VMAT planning and verification technique for dynamic tracking using a direct aperture deformation (DAD) method.
    Zhang Y; Yang Y; Fu W; Li X; Li T; Heron DE; Huq MS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):50-61. PubMed ID: 28300367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification of four-dimensional photon dose calculations.
    Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3438-47. PubMed ID: 19746777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast motion-including dose error reconstruction for VMAT with and without MLC tracking.
    Ravkilde T; Keall PJ; Grau C; Høyer M; Poulsen PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7279-96. PubMed ID: 25383729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms.
    Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Monte Carlo tool for evaluating VMAT and DIMRT treatment deliveries including planar detectors.
    Asuni G; van Beek TA; Venkataraman S; Popescu IA; McCurdy BM
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3535-50. PubMed ID: 23640066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-resolved dose reconstruction by motion encoding of volumetric modulated arc therapy fields delivered with and without dynamic multi-leaf collimator tracking.
    Ravkilde T; Keall PJ; Grau C; Høyer M; Poulsen PR
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1497-503. PubMed ID: 23984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of measurement-guided 3D VMAT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom.
    Opp D; Nelms BE; Zhang G; Stevens C; Feygelman V
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4154. PubMed ID: 23835381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of a novel algorithm for true 4D-VMAT planning with comparison to tracked, gated and static delivery.
    Chin E; Otto K
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2698-707. PubMed ID: 21776806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans.
    Swinnen AC; Öllers MC; Roijen E; Nijsten SM; Verhaegen F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):186-195. PubMed ID: 28291941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
    McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-resolved dose distributions to moving targets during volumetric modulated arc therapy with and without dynamic MLC tracking.
    Ravkilde T; Keall PJ; Grau C; Høyer M; Poulsen PR
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111723. PubMed ID: 24320431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amplitude gating for a coached breathing approach in respiratory gated 10 MV flattening filter-free VMAT delivery.
    Viel F; Lee R; Gete E; Duzenli C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):78–90. PubMed ID: 26219000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
    McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.