These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387731)
1. Motion as a perturbation: measurement-guided dose estimates to moving patient voxels during modulated arc deliveries. Feygelman V; Stambaugh C; Zhang G; Hunt D; Opp D; Wolf TK; Nelms BE Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021708. PubMed ID: 23387731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motion as perturbation. II. Development of the method for dosimetric analysis of motion effects with fixed-gantry IMRT. Nelms BE; Opp D; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061704. PubMed ID: 24877799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient. Nelms BE; Opp D; Robinson J; Wolf TK; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4228-38. PubMed ID: 22830756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 4D dose simulation in volumetric arc therapy: Accuracy and affecting parameters. Sothmann T; Gauer T; Werner R PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172810. PubMed ID: 28231337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments. Poulsen PR; Schmidt ML; Keall P; Worm ES; Fledelius W; Hoffmann L Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6237-46. PubMed ID: 23039659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen. Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of planned dose reporting methods on Gamma pass rates for IROC lung and liver motion phantoms treated with pencil beam scanning protons. Kang Y; Shen J; Liu W; Taylor PA; Mehrens HS; Ding X; Hu Y; Tryggestad E; Keole SR; Schild SE; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):108. PubMed ID: 31208439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification. Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 4D VMAT planning and verification technique for dynamic tracking using a direct aperture deformation (DAD) method. Zhang Y; Yang Y; Fu W; Li X; Li T; Heron DE; Huq MS J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):50-61. PubMed ID: 28300367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verification of four-dimensional photon dose calculations. Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3438-47. PubMed ID: 19746777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast motion-including dose error reconstruction for VMAT with and without MLC tracking. Ravkilde T; Keall PJ; Grau C; Høyer M; Poulsen PR Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7279-96. PubMed ID: 25383729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms. Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing phase- and amplitude-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy using 3D printed lung phantom. Lee M; Yoon K; Cho B; Kim SS; Song SY; Choi EK; Ahn S; Lee SW; Kwak J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 30667581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Monte Carlo tool for evaluating VMAT and DIMRT treatment deliveries including planar detectors. Asuni G; van Beek TA; Venkataraman S; Popescu IA; McCurdy BM Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3535-50. PubMed ID: 23640066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-resolved dose reconstruction by motion encoding of volumetric modulated arc therapy fields delivered with and without dynamic multi-leaf collimator tracking. Ravkilde T; Keall PJ; Grau C; Høyer M; Poulsen PR Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1497-503. PubMed ID: 23984811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of a novel algorithm for true 4D-VMAT planning with comparison to tracked, gated and static delivery. Chin E; Otto K Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2698-707. PubMed ID: 21776806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of measurement-guided 3D VMAT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom. Opp D; Nelms BE; Zhang G; Stevens C; Feygelman V J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4154. PubMed ID: 23835381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans. Swinnen AC; Öllers MC; Roijen E; Nijsten SM; Verhaegen F J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):186-195. PubMed ID: 28291941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification. McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-resolved dose distributions to moving targets during volumetric modulated arc therapy with and without dynamic MLC tracking. Ravkilde T; Keall PJ; Grau C; Høyer M; Poulsen PR Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111723. PubMed ID: 24320431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]