173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387738)
1. Reduced-order constrained optimization (ROCO): clinical application to head-and-neck IMRT.
Rivera L; Yorke E; Kowalski A; Yang J; Radke RJ; Jackson A
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021715. PubMed ID: 23387738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced order constrained optimization (ROCO): clinical application to lung IMRT.
Stabenau H; Rivera L; Yorke E; Yang J; Lu R; Radke RJ; Jackson A
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2731-41. PubMed ID: 21776810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study.
Lian J; Yuan L; Ge Y; Chera BS; Yoo DP; Chang S; Yin F; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121704. PubMed ID: 24320490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study.
Wu B; Pang D; Simari P; Taylor R; Sanguineti G; McNutt T
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021714. PubMed ID: 23387737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans.
Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of a deep reinforcement learning network for dose-volume-constrained treatment planning in prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Sprouts D; Gao Y; Wang C; Jia X; Shen C; Chi Y
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Jun; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 35523130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated intensity modulated treatment planning: The expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.
Zarepisheh M; Hong L; Zhou Y; Oh JH; Mechalakos JG; Hunt MA; Mageras GS; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2944-2954. PubMed ID: 31055858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.
Kantz S; Söhn M; Troeller A; Reiner M; Weingandt H; Alber M; Belka C; Ganswindt U
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():184. PubMed ID: 26328628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application programming in C# environment with recorded user software interactions and its application in autopilot of VMAT/IMRT treatment planning.
Wang H; Xing L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):189-203. PubMed ID: 27929493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative comparison of automatic and manual IMRT optimization for prostate cancer: the benefits of DVH prediction.
Yang Y; Li T; Yuan L; Ge Y; Yin FF; Lee WR; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5204. PubMed ID: 26103191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three IMRT advanced planning tools: A multi-institutional side-by-side comparison.
Lu L; Sheng Y; Donaghue J; Liu Shen Z; Kolar M; Wu QJ; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):65-77. PubMed ID: 31364798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-GPU implementation of a VMAT treatment plan optimization algorithm.
Tian Z; Peng F; Folkerts M; Tan J; Jia X; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2841-52. PubMed ID: 26127037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning.
Fried DV; Chera BS; Das SK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):245-250. PubMed ID: 28857470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of plan quality degradation to evaluate tradeoffs in delivery efficiency and clinical plan metrics arising from IMRT optimizer and sequencer compromises.
Wilkie JR; Matuszak MM; Feng M; Moran JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071708. PubMed ID: 23822412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
Mathews J; French SB; Bhagroo S; Pant A; Nazareth DP
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 32978967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans--Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system.
Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Benedek H; Nilsson P; Knöös T
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3130-8. PubMed ID: 21815387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Kierkels RG; Visser R; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA; van 't Veld AA; Steenbakkers RJ; Korevaar EW
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():87. PubMed ID: 25885444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
