173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387738)
21. Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Plans Between 1.5T MR-Linac and Conventional Linac.
Ding S; Li Y; Liu H; Li R; Wang B; Zhang J; Chen Y; Huang X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():1533033820985871. PubMed ID: 33472549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduced-order constrained optimization in IMRT planning.
Lu R; Radke RJ; Yang J; Happersett L; Yorke E; Jackson A
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6749-66. PubMed ID: 18997270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A feasibility study of automated inverse treatment planning for cancer of the prostate.
Reinstein LE; Wang XH; Burman CM; Chen Z; Mohan R; Kutcher G; Leibel SA; Fuks Z
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 9422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating machine learning enhanced intelligent-optimization-engine (IOE) performance for ethos head-and-neck (HN) plan generation.
Visak J; Inam E; Meng B; Wang S; Parsons D; Nyugen D; Zhang T; Moon D; Avkshtol V; Jiang S; Sher D; Lin MH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13950. PubMed ID: 36877668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automatic learning-based beam angle selection for thoracic IMRT.
Amit G; Purdie TG; Levinshtein A; Hope AJ; Lindsay P; Marshall A; Jaffray DA; Pekar V
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1992-2005. PubMed ID: 25832090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and efficiency in complex head and neck IMRT.
Sabatino M; Kretschmer M; Zink K; Würschmidt F
Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 7():7. PubMed ID: 22269088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical experience transitioning from IMRT to VMAT for head and neck cancer.
Studenski MT; Bar-Ad V; Siglin J; Cognetti D; Curry J; Tuluc M; Harrison AS
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 23246253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Kamal-Sayed H; Ma J; Tseung H; Abdel-Rehim A; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5643-5652. PubMed ID: 30332515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation.
Nguyen D; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5596-5609. PubMed ID: 28834556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel conformity index for intensity modulated radiation therapy plan evaluation.
Cheung FW; Law MY
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5740-56. PubMed ID: 22957639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.
Nguyen D; Lyu Q; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Low DA; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4263. PubMed ID: 27370141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system.
Semenenko VA; Reitz B; Day E; Qi XS; Miften M; Li XA
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5851-60. PubMed ID: 19175141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing software upgrades, plan properties and patient geometry using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) complexity metrics.
McGarry CK; Chinneck CD; O'Toole MM; O'Sullivan JM; Prise KM; Hounsell AR
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2027-34. PubMed ID: 21626935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
