187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23387755)
21. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Full 3-D modulation transfer function estimation of tomosynthesis system using modified Richardson-Lucy deconvolution.
Song H; Lee C; Baek J
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2510-2525. PubMed ID: 38011539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital Tomosynthesis System Geometry Analysis Using Convolution-Based Blur-and-Add (BAA) Model.
Wu M; Yoon S; Solomon EG; Star-Lack J; Pelc N; Fahrig R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Jan; 35(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 26208308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of algorithms for out-of-plane artifacts removal in digital tomosynthesis reconstructions.
Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Buliev I
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jul; 107(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 22056810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High-attenuation artifact reduction in breast tomosynthesis using a novel reconstruction algorithm.
Dustler M; Wicklein J; Förnvik H; Boita J; Bakic P; Lång K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():21-26. PubMed ID: 31153567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT.
Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Bakhtiar B; Moseley DJ; Richard S; Keller H; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 16485425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A method for selective removal of out-of-plane structures in digital tomosynthesis.
Kolitsi Z; Panayiotakis G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8455511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Thick slices from tomosynthesis data sets: phantom study for the evaluation of different algorithms.
Diekmann F; Meyer H; Diekmann S; Puong S; Muller S; Bick U; Rogalla P
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 17955296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Lee YZ; Heath MD; Wang X; Foos DH; Lu J; Zhou O
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 25478786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital tomosynthesis of the thorax: the influence of respiratory motion artifacts on lung nodule detection.
Kim SM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Kang H; Song IY; Lee EJ; Hwang HS
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 23528563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Statistical iterative reconstruction to improve image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Xu S; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5377-90. PubMed ID: 26328987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficient low-dose CT artifact mitigation using an artifact-matched prior scan.
Xu W; Mueller K
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4748-60. PubMed ID: 22894400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.
Dobbins JT; Godfrey DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):R65-106. PubMed ID: 14579853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
