These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23388075)
21. An exploration of the epistemological intricacies of using qualitative data to develop a quantitative measure of user views of health care. Coyle J; Williams B J Adv Nurs; 2000 May; 31(5):1235-43. PubMed ID: 10840258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Qualitative longitudinal studies in the context of Palliative Care - methodological, ethical and psychosocial aspects]. Kreyer C; Pleschberger S Pflege; 2017 Jul; 30(4):209-217. PubMed ID: 28481138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Recruiting older people into a large, community-based study of heart failure. Barnes S; Gott M; Payne S; Parker C; Seamark D; Gariballa S; Small N Chronic Illn; 2005 Dec; 1(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 17152456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tight Ties in Collaborative Health Research Puts Research Ethics on Trial? A Discussion on Autonomy, Confidentiality, and Integrity in Qualitative Research. Øye C; Sørensen NØ; Dahl H; Glasdam S Qual Health Res; 2019 Jul; 29(8):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 30623753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implementation and data-related challenges in the Deepening our Understanding of Quality in Australia (DUQuA) study: implications for large-scale cross-sectional research. Arnolda G; Winata T; Ting HP; Clay-Williams R; Taylor N; Tran Y; Braithwaite J Int J Qual Health Care; 2020 Feb; 32(Supplement_1):75-83. PubMed ID: 32026937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Practical considerations in case study research: the relationship between methodology and process. McDonnell A; Lloyd Jones M; Read S J Adv Nurs; 2000 Aug; 32(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 10964186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Revisiting longitudinal qualitative studies in social work: considerations for design and methodological insights. de-Toro X; Rubilar G; Saracostti M Longit Life Course Stud; 2024 May; 15(3):407-430. PubMed ID: 38954408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis. Thorne S Qual Health Res; 1998 Jul; 8(4):547-55. PubMed ID: 10558343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter. Rees S; Williams A JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Bradley EH; Curry LA; Devers KJ Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1758-72. PubMed ID: 17286625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mixed methods research: a design for emergency care research? Cooper S; Porter J; Endacott R Emerg Med J; 2011 Aug; 28(8):682-5. PubMed ID: 20713360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical dilemmas in nonclinical health research from a UK perspective. Grinyer A Nurs Ethics; 2001 Mar; 8(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 16010887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical research 4: qualitative data collection and analysis. Endacott R Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2005 Apr; 21(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15778077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How to Design a Qualitative Health Research Study. Part 2: Data Generation and Analysis Considerations. Luciani M; Orr E; Campbell K; Nguyen L; Ausili D; Jack SM Prof Inferm; 2019; 72(3):221-231. PubMed ID: 31883573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Reconstituting evaluation methods based on both qualitative and quantitative paradigms]. Miyata H; Okubo S; Yoshie S; Kai I Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2011 Jan; 66(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 21358139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Methodological issues in the evaluation of the quality of public health nursing: a case study of the maternal and child health centres in Hong Kong. Twinn S J Adv Nurs; 1997 Apr; 25(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 9104671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Methodological considerations for the design and implementation of a fully longitudinal mixed methods study. Schumacher KL; Plano Clark VL; Eilers J; Kigondu N; Geary C; Kupzyk K; Lydiatt WM; Lackner RP; Ly Q Res Nurs Health; 2021 Jun; 44(3):571-580. PubMed ID: 33821492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Exploiting the emergent nature of mixed methods designs: insights from a mixed methods impact evaluation in Malawi. De Allegri M; Brenner S; Kambala C; Mazalale J; Muula AS; Chinkhumba J; Wilhelm D; Lohmann J Health Policy Plan; 2020 Feb; 35(1):102-106. PubMed ID: 31625554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Conducting qualitative research in the health sector: researcher issues and dilemmas. Hill S; Beattie RS; McDougall M Health Serv Manage Res; 1999 Aug; 12(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 10539406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]