188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23388397)
1. A prospective, in vivo evaluation of two pressure-redistribution surfaces in healthy volunteers using pressure mapping as a quality control instrument .
Miller S; Parker M; Blasiole N; Beinlich N; Fulton J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 23388397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective assessment of sacral pressures in healthy volunteers seated upright and reclined with legs elevated in a recliner.
Miller SK; Aberegg L; Blasiole K; Parker M; Fulton J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Sep; 60(9):52-9. PubMed ID: 25211607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventing deep tissue injury from extended procedures.
Miller S; Parker M; Blasiole K; Beinlich N; Fulton JA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Jul; 59(7):8. PubMed ID: 24006530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Curvilinear Supine Position on Tissue Interface Pressure: A Prospective Before-and-After Study.
Guo Y; Li Y; Zhao K; Yue X; Yu Y; Kuang W; Liu J; Li X; Zhao T
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):450-454. PubMed ID: 28877111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.
Thompson-Bishop JY; Mottola CM
Decubitus; 1992 Mar; 5(2):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 1558691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of air-cell and gel surgical table pads and an evaluation of the influence of pressure distribution and other factors on pressure injury prevention.
Guzman S; Allegretti AL; Kormos RL; Brienza DM
J Tissue Viability; 2021 Feb; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 33468340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Support surface interface pressure, microenvironment, and the prevalence of pressure ulcers: an analysis of the literature.
Reger SI; Ranganathan VK; Sahgal V
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Oct; 53(10):50-8. PubMed ID: 17978415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of interface pressures in the evaluation of operating theatre mattresses.
Scott EM; Baker EA; Kelly PJ; Stoddard EJ; Leaper DJ
J Wound Care; 1999 Oct; 8(9):437-41. PubMed ID: 10818892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes.
Hiser B; Rochette J; Philbin S; Lowerhouse N; Terburgh C; Pietsch C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):48-59. PubMed ID: 16464994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of multiple layers of linens on surface interface pressure: results of a laboratory study.
Williamson R; Lachenbruch C; Vangilder C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Jun; 59(6):38-48. PubMed ID: 23749661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective, Descriptive, Quality Improvement Study to Investigate the Impact of a Turn-and-Position Device on the Incidence of Hospital-acquired Sacral Pressure Ulcers and Nursing Staff Time Needed for Repositioning Patients.
Hall KD; Clark RC
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Nov; 62(11):40-44. PubMed ID: 27861136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Retrospective, Descriptive, Comparative Study to Identify Patient Variables That Contribute to the Development of Deep Tissue Injury Among Patients in Intensive Care Units.
Kirkland-Kyhn H; Teleten O; Wilson M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Feb; 63(2):42-47. PubMed ID: 28267682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous bedside pressure mapping and rates of hospital-associated pressure ulcers in a medical intensive care unit.
Behrendt R; Ghaznavi AM; Mahan M; Craft S; Siddiqui A
Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 24585161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of interface pressures on three operating table support surfaces during surgery.
Aslan Basli A; Yavuz Van Giersbergen M
J Tissue Viability; 2021 Aug; 30(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 33994285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring tissue interface pressures of two support surfaces used in the operating room.
Blaylock B; Gardner C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Mar; 40(2):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8043178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of elevating the head of bed on interface pressure in volunteers.
Peterson M; Schwab W; McCutcheon K; van Oostrom JH; Gravenstein N; Caruso L
Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3038-42. PubMed ID: 18824905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sacral skin blood flow response to alternating pressure operating room overlay.
Karg P; Ranganathan VK; Churilla M; Brienza D
J Tissue Viability; 2019 May; 28(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 30948241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of systematic evaluation in determining the effectiveness and practical utility of a pressure-redistributing support surface.
Ward C
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20106665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
