189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23388397)
21. [Quantitative assessment of pressure relief at the sacral area in adults lying supine on the operating room table].
Masatsugu M; Akata T; Itonaga Y; Nakao F; Kansha M; Sato M; Takamatsu J
Masui; 2005 Mar; 54(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 15794114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of patient support surfaces: principle, practice and limitations.
Rithalia S
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 16012067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pressure relief capabilities of the Sof.Care bed and the Clinitron bed.
Maklebust J; Siggreen MY; Mondoux L
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():32, 36-41, 44. PubMed ID: 3250579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and validity of a new model for assessing pressure redistribution properties of support surfaces.
Matsuo J; Sugama J; Sanada H; Okuwa M; Nakatani T; Konya C; Sakamoto J
J Tissue Viability; 2011 May; 20(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 21292487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.
Counsell C; Seymour S; Guin P; Hudson A
J Enterostomal Ther; 1990; 17(4):150-3. PubMed ID: 2380423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
Malbrain M; Hendriks B; Wijnands P; Denie D; Jans A; Vanpellicom J; De Keulenaer B
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20079647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interface pressure comparison of healthy premature infants with various neonatal bed surfaces.
Turnage-Carrier C; McLane KM; Gregurich MA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2008 Jun; 8(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 18535423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat.
Patel UH; Jones JT; Babbs CF; Bourland JD; Graber GP
Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 8347281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interface pressure measurement during surgery: a comparison of four operating table surfaces.
Keller BP; van Overbeeke J; van der Werken C
J Wound Care; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16669297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pressure-relieving properties of a intra-operative warming device.
Baker EA; Leaper DJ
J Wound Care; 2003 Apr; 12(4):156-60. PubMed ID: 12715489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective, observational study of high-specification foam immersion surfaces used in populations at high risk for pressure ulcers.
Girolami S; Moore A; Haper C; Betts C; Woodward T
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Aug; 60(8):30-9. PubMed ID: 25105476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early prevention of pressure ulcers among elderly patients admitted through emergency departments: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pham B; Teague L; Mahoney J; Goodman L; Paulden M; Poss J; Li J; Ieraci L; Carcone S; Krahn M
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 58(5):468-78.e3. PubMed ID: 21820208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Operating table. The root cause of many pressure sores?
Waterlow J
Br J Theatre Nurs; 1996 Oct; 6(7):19-21. PubMed ID: 8974512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Continuous monitoring of interface pressure distribution in intensive care patients for pressure ulcer prevention.
Sakai K; Sanada H; Matsui N; Nakagami G; Sugama J; Komiyama C; Yahagi N
J Adv Nurs; 2009 Apr; 65(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19228239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effectiveness of lying surfaces in nursing care beds, a comparison of spring element systems versus conventional systems: A post marketing clinical follow-up pilot study.
Beime B; Lahmann NA
J Tissue Viability; 2018 Aug; 27(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29937265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Support surfaces for intraoperative prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pham B; Teague L; Mahoney J; Goodman L; Paulden M; Poss J; Li J; Sikich NJ; Lourenco R; Ieraci L; Carcone S; Krahn M
Surgery; 2011 Jul; 150(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 21683861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomized controlled trial to compare the interface pressures of alternating pressure overlay with gel pad versus gel pad alone during prolonged surgery.
Neo TG; Koo SH; Chew STH; Png GK; Lacuesta MJ; Wu MYL; Tay RYC; Singh PA; Chandran R
J Tissue Viability; 2021 May; 30(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 33612359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Interface Pressures and Subjective Comfort of Pressure-Relieving Overlays on the Operating Table for Healthy Volunteers.
Han MJ; Ko S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33807963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL
Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Potential for bed sores due to high pressures: influence of body sites, body position, and mattress design.
Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 8260338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
