These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23388451)

  • 1. A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory.
    Yamashita T; Ichihara K; Miyamoto A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Apr; 51(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 23388451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The multi-item univariate delta check method: a new approach.
    Rheem I; Lee KN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():859-63. PubMed ID: 10384583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Highly accurate and explainable detection of specimen mix-up using a machine learning model.
    Mitani T; Doi S; Yokota S; Imai T; Ohe K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Feb; 58(3):375-383. PubMed ID: 32031970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Revisited univariate delta check method for hematologic laboratories (I)--Usefulness for detection of specimen mix-up in patients with hematologic disorders].
    Ohara T; Itoh K
    Rinsho Byori; 2002 Nov; 50(11):1072-5. PubMed ID: 12491605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A highly accurate delta check method using deep learning for detection of sample mix-up in the clinical laboratory.
    Zhou R; Liang YF; Cheng HL; Wang W; Huang DW; Wang Z; Feng X; Han ZW; Song B; Padoan A; Plebani M; Wang QT
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 60(12):1984-1992. PubMed ID: 34963042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multivariate delta check method for detecting specimen mix-up.
    Iizuka Y; Kume H; Kitamura M
    Clin Chem; 1982 Nov; 28(11):2244-8. PubMed ID: 7127769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential application of rate and delta check on selected clinical chemistry tests.
    Kim JW; Kim JQ; Kim SI
    J Korean Med Sci; 1990 Dec; 5(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 2100125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delta Check Practices and Outcomes: A Q-Probes Study Involving 49 Health Care Facilities and 6541 Delta Check Alerts.
    Schifman RB; Talbert M; Souers RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 141(6):813-823. PubMed ID: 28402169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and Evaluation of a Logical Delta Check for Identifying Erroneous Blood Count Results in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
    Miller I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Aug; 139(8):1042-7. PubMed ID: 26230597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model to establish autoverification in the clinical laboratory.
    Topcu DI; Gulbahar O
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul; 93():90-98. PubMed ID: 33831387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A normalization method for combination of laboratory test results from different electronic healthcare databases in a distributed research network.
    Yoon D; Schuemie MJ; Kim JH; Kim DK; Park MY; Ahn EK; Jung EY; Park DK; Cho SY; Shin D; Hwang Y; Park RW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Mar; 25(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 26527579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The missing link: quality in the identification and preanalytic phase].
    Dhondt JL
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2001; 59(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 11282530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How useful are delta checks in the 21 century? A stochastic-dynamic model of specimen mix-up and detection.
    Ovens K; Naugler C
    J Pathol Inform; 2012; 3():5. PubMed ID: 22439125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refining and using Lotus 1-2-3, Part 2. Using Lotus 1-2-3 to assist with indicator monitors.
    Dalto M
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Aug; 25(8):73-5. PubMed ID: 10127790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Accuracy of Gender Distinction Based on Basic Laboratory Test Results: Comparison between Conventional Logistic Regression Analysis and a Weighted Log-Likelihood Estimation].
    Yamashita T; Ichihara K
    Rinsho Byori; 2015 Feb; 63(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26529967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 2. A bimodal retrospective concept for determining reference limits from intra-laboratory databases demonstrated by catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes.
    Arzideh F; Wosniok W; Gurr E; Hinsch W; Schumann G; Weinstock N; Haeckel R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(8):1043-57. PubMed ID: 17867994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integration of data derived from biological variation into the quality management system.
    Ricós C; Alvarez V; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15234631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulations of delta check rule performance to detect specimen mislabeling using historical laboratory data.
    Strathmann FG; Baird GS; Hoffman NG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 412(21-22):1973-7. PubMed ID: 21782806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An approach to optimize delta checks in test panels - The effect of the number of rules included.
    Tan RZ; Markus C; Loh TP
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2020 May; 57(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 31955587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.